Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 32
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13068 (2026)

Decisions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
1.  Licensing.  After hearing, the commission may affirm, modify or reverse the director's decision to deny an examination, license or renewal license or, in its discretion, file a complaint in the District Court pursuant to Title 4, chapter 5 and Title 5, section 10051 to determine whether a license may be denied.  
[PL 1999, c. 547, Pt. B, §75 (AMD); PL 1999, c. 547, Pt. B, §80 (AFF).]
2.  Violation of chapter.  If, after hearing, the commission finds that a violation of this chapter has occurred, it may:  
A. Reprimand the person or entity;   [PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
B. Require the person or entity to comply with such terms and conditions as it determines necessary to correct the basis for the violation or prevent further violations by issuing a cease and desist order. Violation of a cease and desist order shall constitute a violation of this chapter;   [PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
C. Assess the violator a fine of no more than $2,000 a violation;   [PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
D. Suspend or revoke any license issued under this chapter; or   [PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
E. Report its findings and recommendations to the Attorney General or the district attorney recommending prosecution.   [PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
[PL 1987, c. 395, Pt. A, §212 (NEW).]
3.  Appeals. 
[PL 2007, c. 402, Pt. BB, §13 (RP).]
Notwithstanding the provisions of Title 10, section 8003, subsection 5‑A, revocations ordered by the commission are subject to judicial review exclusively in the Superior Court in accordance with Title 5, chapter 375, subchapter 7.   [PL 2007, c. 402, Pt. BB, §13 (NEW).]
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1987, c. 395, §A212 (NEW). PL 1999, c. 547, §§B75,78 (AMD). PL 1999, c. 547, §B80 (AFF). PL 2007, c. 402, Pt. BB, §13 (AMD).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2006 · leading case: Cobb v. Bd. of Counseling Professionals Licensure, 2006 ME 48 (Me. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cobb v. Bd. of Counseling Professionals Licensure, 2006 ME 48 (Me. 2006). · cites it 2× “§ 8003(5)(A-1)(3) (2005); 32 M.R.S. § 13068(2)(C) (governing the Real Estate Commission); 32 M.”
Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19 (Me. 1999). “See 32 M.R.S.A. § 13068(2)(D) (1988). Therefore, in order for Smith to have received a commission without placing Jaret & Cohn in the position of violating the Act, it would have been necessary for the Crosses to have paid half of the commission to Jaret & Cohn and the other…”
Winsor v. Maine Real Est. Comm'n, 695 A.2d 1198 (Me. 1997). “” 4 Winsor subsequently appealed the decision to the Administrative Court pursuant to 32 M.R.S.A. § 13068(3X1988). On September 25, 1996, the court affirmed the decision of the Commission, and this appeal followed.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13068(2)(C) — 1 case
Cobb v. Bd. of Counseling Professionals Licensure, 2006 ME 48 (Me. 2006). “§ 8003(5)(A-1)(3) (2005); 32 M.R.S. § 13068(2)(C) (governing the Real Estate Commission); 32 M.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 32, § 13068(2)(D) — 1 case
Smith v. Cannell, 1999 ME 19 (Me. 1999). “See 32 M.R.S.A. § 13068(2)(D) (1988). Therefore, in order for Smith to have received a commission without placing Jaret & Cohn in the position of violating the Act, it would have been necessary for the Crosses to have paid half of the commission to Jaret & Cohn and the other…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.