Me. Rev. Stat. » Title 39
Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-A (2026)

Appellate Division created

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 514, §6 (NEW). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
The Revisor's Office cannot provide legal advice or interpretation of Maine law to the public.
If you need legal advice, please consult a qualified attorney.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1983–2015 · leading case: Kuvaja v. Bethel Sav. Bank, 495 A.2d 804 (Me. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kuvaja v. Bethel Sav. Bank, 495 A.2d 804 (Me. 1985). · cites it 3× “(Emphasis added) The procedure for appeal of a workers’ compensation decision outlined in 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 103-A through 103-E (Phamp.”
Wilner Wood Prods. Co. v. Moyse, 466 A.2d 1257 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “514, § 6, enacting 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 103-A— 103-E (Supp.1982-1983), effective September 18, 1981.”
Russell v. Duchess Footwear, 487 A.2d 256 (Me. 1985). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-A(2) further mandates that [t]he division shall establish uniform rules of procedure calculated to provide a prompt and inexpensive review of a decision by the commission.”
Workers' Comp. Bd. Abuse Investigation Unit v. Nate Holyoke Builders, Inc., 2015 ME 99 (Me. 2015). · cites it 2× “These procedures for review of Board decisions mirror the procedures in effect from 1981 to 1993, which allowed an appeal from a 8 decision of the former Workers’ Compensation Commission to proceed as of right to the former Appellate Division, and then to us on a discretionary…”
Hastings v. Union Boiler Co., 636 F. Supp. 837 (D. Me. 1986). · cites it 3× “§§ 2201 , 2202, that the appellate review procedures of the Maine Workers’ Compensation system, 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 103-A, 103-B and 103-C (Supp.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-A(2) — 2 cases
Kuvaja v. Bethel Sav. Bank, 495 A.2d 804 (Me. 1985). “(Emphasis added) The procedure for appeal of a workers’ compensation decision outlined in 39 M.R.S.A. §§ 103-A through 103-E (Phamp.”
Russell v. Duchess Footwear, 487 A.2d 256 (Me. 1985). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-A(2) further mandates that [t]he division shall establish uniform rules of procedure calculated to provide a prompt and inexpensive review of a decision by the commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.