Maine Revised Statutes

Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-C (2026)

Appeal from a decision of the division

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ME-LEGlegislature.maine.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(REPEALED)
SECTION HISTORY
PL 1981, c. 514, §6 (NEW). PL 1983, c. 643, §2 (AMD). PL 1985, c. 372, §A41 (AMD). PL 1991, c. 885, §A7 (RP). PL 1991, c. 885, §§A9-11 (AFF).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases, 1983–1997 · leading case: Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co., 497 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1985).
Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co., 497 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1985). · cites it 2× “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C(3) (Pamph. 1979-1984).”
LaPointe v. United Engineers & Constructors, 680 A.2d 458 (Me. 1996). · cites it 2× “" The Board denied United Engineers' motion for findings of fact, and we granted the employer's petition for appellate review pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (1989). United Engineers contends that the setoff awarded in 1991 was not conditional on the continuation of weekly…”
Wilner Wood Prods. Co. v. Moyse, 466 A.2d 1257 (Me. 1983). · cites it 2× “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C. When granted, the appeal goes forward in the same manner as an appeal from the Superior Court.”
Nielsen v. Burnham & Morrill, Inc., 600 A.2d 1111 (Me. 1991). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (1989). Nielsen is entitled to compensation for his work-related injury that is based on his average weekly wage.”
LeBlanc v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc., 584 A.2d 675 (Me. 1991). “The Commission awarded LaPointe total incapacity benefits for the full seventeen-week period, reduced by the amount of the payments made to LaPointe under the New Hampshire statute.”
Rowe v. Chapman Trucking, 629 A.2d 1224 (Me. 1993). · cites it 2× “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (1989). As we have repeatedly said, "[u]nless a statute expresses a contrary intent, the plain, common and ordinary meaning of statutory language controls the interpretation of the statute.”
Guar. Fund Mgmt. Servs. v. Workers' Comp. Bd., 678 A.2d 578 (Me. 1996). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C. In 1991, former subsection 104-A was amended to grant authority to the Superintendent of Insurance to assess forfeitures.”
Dissell v. Trans World Airlines, 511 A.2d 441 (Me. 1986). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C(1) (Pamph. 1985); M.R.”
Hird v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 512 A.2d 1035 (Me. 1986). “In response the employee filed a petition for appellate review to this Court pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (Pamph.1985) seeking to revive the single commissioner’s decision granting him benefits.”
Caron v. Maine Sch. Admin. Dist. No. 27, 594 A.2d 560 (Me. 1991). “See 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (1989). The District asserts that the Commission 2 erred in comparing Caron’s work stress to the pressures experienced by the average employee generally, arguing that section 51(3)(A) requires a comparison of the employee’s work stress with the stress…”
Dionne v. Libbey-Owens Ford Co., 621 A.2d 414 (Me. 1993). “Pursuant to 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C, we granted Libbey-Owens’s petition for a review of the decision.”
Kuvaja v. Bethel Sav. Bank, 495 A.2d 804 (Me. 1985). “On March 25, 1985, we granted the Employer’s petition seeking discretionary review by this court under 39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C (Pamph.1979-1984). 3 *806 Our role on appeals from decisions of the Appellate Division is limited strictly to reviewing for errors of law.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-C(1) — 1 case
Dissell v. Trans World Airlines, 511 A.2d 441 (Me. 1986). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C(1) (Pamph. 1985); M.R.”
— Me. Rev. Stat. tit. 39, § 103-C(3) — 2 cases
Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co., 497 A.2d 1112 (Me. 1985). “39 M.R.S.A. § 103-C(3) (Pamph. 1979-1984).”
Russell v. Duchess Footwear, 487 A.2d 256 (Me. 1985).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.