Massachusetts General Laws

Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 43, § 103 (2026)

City manager; appointment; qualifications; compensation; removal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MAmalegislature.gov (official) JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 103. The city council shall appoint a city manager who shall be sworn to the faithful performance of his duties and who shall be the chief administrative officer of the city and shall be responsible for the administration of all departments, commissions, boards and officers of the city, whether established before its adoption of this plan or thereafter, except that of the city clerk, city auditor, any official appointed by the governor or any body elected by the voters of the city. He shall be appointed on the basis of his administrative and executive qualifications only, and need not be a resident of the city or commonwealth when appointed. He shall hold office during the pleasure of the city council and shall receive such compensation as it shall fix by ordinance. No member of the city council shall during his term of office be chosen as city manager, and no person who has within two years been elected to or served in any elective office in the city or in the county in which the city is located shall be chosen as city manager.

Before the city manager may be removed, if he so demand, he shall be given a written statement of the reasons alleged for his removal and shall have the right to be heard publicly thereon at a meeting of the city council prior to the final vote on the question of his removal, but pending and during such hearing the city council may suspend him from office. The action of the city council in suspending or removing the city manager shall be final, it being the intention of this provision to vest all authority and fix all responsibility for such suspension or removal in the city council. In case of the absence, disability or suspension of the city manager, the city council shall designate the head of some department to perform the duties of city manager during such absence, disability or suspension, and, in case the office of city manager becomes vacant, the city council shall designate the head of some department to serve as acting city manager until a new city manager is appointed.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2022 · leading case: Holahan v. City of Medford, 474 N.E.2d 1117 (Mass. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holahan v. City of Medford, 474 N.E.2d 1117 (Mass. 1985). “G. L. c. 43, § 103. Allen v. Cambridge, 316 Mass.”
John Doe v. Cambridge Pub. Schs.., 101 Mass. App. Ct. 482 (Mass. App. Ct. 2022). “[Note 3] See G. L. c. 43, § 103 ("The city council shall appoint a city manager who shall be sworn to the faithful performance of his duties and who shall be the chief administrative officer of the city and shall be responsible for the administration of all departments,…”
Chief of Police v. City Manager, 416 N.E.2d 985 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981). · cites it 3× “There is some possible conflict between (and overlapping of) (a) the broad provisions of G. L. c. 43, § 103, as amended (note 3, supra) providing that the city manager “shall be responsible for the administration of all departments .”
City Manager of Medford v. State Labor Relations Comm'n, 233 N.E.2d 310 (Mass. 1968). “; Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 22.15), as a person within the definition of “municipal employer” in c.”
Walcott v. City of Cambridge, 217 N.E.2d 723 (Mass. 1966). “To obviate a legal question, a majority of the council voted to remove the predecessor city manager (see G. L. c. 43, § 103, as amended through St.”
City of Worcester v. Directors of the Worcester Free Pub. Library, 211 N.E.2d 356 (Mass. 1965). · cites it 3× “The city contends that this provision is contrary to G. L. c. 43, §§ 103 and 104, and makes the election of the board of directors by the Plan E city council illegal.”
Conway v. City Manager, 359 N.E.2d 1310 (Mass. App. Ct. 1977). “The defendant, as chief administrative officer of the city of Medford (G. L. c. 43, § 103, as amended through St.”
Worcester v. Directors of the Worcester Free Pub. Lib., 211 N.E.2d 356 (Mass. 1965). · cites it 3× “Green's gifts that the donor has otherwise provided. The deed of gift provided that the board of directors be chosen by the city council.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.