Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.1301 (2026)

Short title.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MOTOR VEHICLE SERVICE AND REPAIR ACT

Act 300 of 1974

257.1301 Short title.

Sec. 1.

This act shall be known and may be cited as the "motor vehicle service and repair act".

History: 1974, Act 300, Eff. Apr. 1, 1975

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 35 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1978–2026 · leading case: Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 732 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. 2007).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc, 732 N.W.2d 514 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 4× “; the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, MCL 257.1301 et seq. ; the Truth in Renting Act, MCL 554.”

Loretta Gayle Galea v. Fca US LLC, 917 N.W.2d 694 (Mich. Ct. App. 2018). “Plaintiff also alleged that the vehicle dealer violated Michigan's Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, *366 MCL 257.1301 et seq ., and that the vehicle manufacturer violated Michigan's new motor vehicle warranties act, MCL 257.”

Auto. Serv. Councils v. Sec'y of State, 267 N.W.2d 698 (Mich. Ct. App. 1978). · cites it 4× “The parties appeal by right from the circuit court's summary judgment for plaintiffs holding unconstitutional several provisions of 1974 PA 300 as amended by 1976 PA 12 , codified as MCLA 257.1301 et seq.; MSA 9.1720(1) et seq.”

Harnden v. Jayco, Inc., 496 F.3d 579 (6th Cir. 2007). “; (4) revocation of acceptance; (5) breach of implied warranty under the MMWA; (6) breach of express warranty; (7) breach of implied warranty of merchantability; and (8) violation of the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act (“MVRSA”), Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.1301 et seq. On May…”

Davis v. Lafontaine Motors, Inc, 719 N.W.2d 890 (Mich. Ct. App. 2006). “; and violation of the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, MCL 257.1301 et seq. *72 LaFontaine moved for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.”

Campbell v. Sullins, 667 N.W.2d 887 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “Campbell appeals as of right the trial court’s order dismissing, pursuant to a directed verdict, his claims of violations of the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act (MVSRA), MCL 257.1301 et seq., and statutory conversion, MCL 600.”

Arim v. Gen. Motors Corp., 520 N.W.2d 695 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “These consolidated appeals arise from a 1986 investigation, known as "Operation Shifty,” that was conducted by the Department of State’s (dos) Bureau of Automotive Regulation (bar) in conjunction with the Office of the Attorney General (oag) into fraudulent practices by…”

Harnden v. Ford Motor Co., 408 F. Supp. 2d 315 (E.D. Mich. 2005). · cites it 2× “Count VIII of Plaintiff's complaint, alleging a violation of Michigan's Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 257.1301 , et seq.”

Harnden v. Ford Motor Co., 408 F. Supp. 2d 309 (E.D. Mich. 2005). · cites it 2× “Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act Count VIII of Plaintiffs Complaint alleges that Defendant Lloyd Bridges violated Michigan’s Motor Vehicle Service and *315 Repair Act, Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 257.1301 , et seq. Lloyd Bridges seeks summary judgment on this claim as well.”

People v. Woods, 504 N.W.2d 24 (Mich. Ct. App. 1993). “Defendant may have an obligation to maintain and allow inspection of certain records under the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, MCL 257.1301 et seq.; MSA 9.1720(1) et seq.”

People v. Taurianen, 300 N.W.2d 720 (Mich. Ct. App. 1980). “*26 The court took judicial notice of the Motor Vehicle Service and Repair Act, MCL 257.1301 et seq.; MSA 9.1720(1) et seq.”

Thomas Bros, Inc v. Sec'y of State, 282 N.W.2d 273 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “1974 PA 300 as amended by 1976 PA 12 , being MCL 257.1301 et seq.; MSA 9.1720(1) et seq.”

Show all 35 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.