Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.512 (2026)
Nonpayment of judgment; suspension of registration and nonresident's operating privilege.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MICHIGAN VEHICLE CODE
Act 300 of 1949
257.512 Nonpayment of judgment; suspension of registration and nonresident's operating privilege.
Sec. 512.
The secretary of state upon receipt of a certified abstract of court record of a judgment rendered in this state or any other state shall forthwith suspend the license and registration and any nonresident's operating privilege of any person against whom such judgment was rendered, except as otherwise provided in this chapter.
History: 1949, Act 300, Eff. Sept. 23, 1949 ;-- Am. 1964, Act 140, Eff. Aug. 28, 1964
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1974–2016 · leading case: Bazzi v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 891 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016).
Bazzi v. Sentinel Ins. Co., 891 N.W.2d 13 (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “MCL 257.512 and MCL 257.513. This also rebuts the suggestion that the insurer would be liable for $20,000 per person/$40,000 per occurrence in PIP benefits.”
Crawford Cnty. v. Sec'y of State, 408 N.W.2d 112 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “2211, MCL 257.512; MSA 9.2212. No suspension will occur if the judgment debtor makes installment payments toward the judgment and provides proof of financial responsibility.”
Rowbotham v. Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch., 244 N.W.2d 389 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976). “MCLA 257.512; MSA 9.2212. Two years later, plaintiffs filed the present suit in the Wayne County Circuit Court, alleging in general terms that defendant’s conduct in causing the suspension of Mr.”
Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Ins. Co. (Mich. Ct. App. 2016). “25 MCL 257.512 and MCL 257.513. 26 This also rebuts the suggestion that the insurer would be liable for $20,000 per person/$40,000 per occurrence in PIP benefits.”
Kowalski v. Sec'y of State, 217 N.W.2d 888 (Mich. Ct. App. 1974). “In Balcain our Supreme Court dealt with the suspension of an operator’s license under MCLA 257.512; MSA 9.2212. Such suspensions are expressly excluded from the provisions of MCLA 257.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.