Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 324.30113 (2026)

Land and water management permit fee fund.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT


Act 451 of 1994


324.30113 Land and water management permit fee fund.

Sec. 30113.

    (1) The land and water management permit fee fund is created within the state treasury.

    (2) The state treasurer may receive money or other assets from any source for deposit into the fund. The state treasurer shall direct the investment of the fund. The state treasurer shall credit to the fund interest and earnings from fund investments. The state treasurer shall annually present to the department an accounting of the amount of money in the fund. The department shall be the administrator of the fund for auditing purposes.

    (3) Money in the fund at the close of the fiscal year shall remain in the fund and shall not lapse to the general fund.

    (4) The department shall expend money from the fund, upon appropriation, only to implement this part and the following:

    (a) Sections 3104, 3107, and 3108.

    (b) Part 303.

    (c) Part 315.

    (d) Part 323.

    (e) Part 325.

    (f) Part 339.

    (g) Part 353.

    (h) Section 117 of the land division act, 1967 PA 288, MCL 560.117.

    (5) The department shall annually report to the legislature how money in the fund was expended during the previous fiscal year.

History: Add. 1995, Act 59, Imd. Eff. May 24, 1995 ;-- Am. 1995, Act 171, Imd. Eff. Oct. 9, 1995 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 246, Eff. Oct. 1, 2004 ;-- Am. 2004, Act 325, Imd. Eff. Sept. 10, 2004 ;-- Am. 2006, Act 496, Imd. Eff. Dec. 29, 2006 ;-- Am. 2014, Act 253, Imd. Eff. June 30, 2014

PopularName Notes:

Act 451

PopularName Notes:

NREPA
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2007–2007 · leading case: Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North Am. Inc, 737 N.W.2d 447 (Mich. 2007).
Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestlé Waters North Am. Inc, 737 N.W.2d 447 (Mich. 2007). · cites it 2× “, and the wetland protection act, MCL 324.30113 et seq. 6 Both plaintiffs and Nestlé appealed and, in a published opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court.”
Michigan Citizens for Water Conservation v. Nestle Waters Na Inc (Mich. 2007). “, and the wetland protection act, MCL 324.30113 et seq. 6 Both plaintiffs and Nestlé appealed and, in a published opinion, the Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.