MCCAULEY-TRAXLER-LAW-BOWMAN-MCNEELY LOTTERY ACT
Act 239 of 1972
432.1 Short title.
Sec. 1.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "McCauley-Traxler-Law-Bowman-McNeely lottery act".
History: 1972, Act 239, Imd. Eff. Aug. 1, 1972 ;-- Am. 1981, Act 40, Imd. Eff. May 13, 1981
Compiler's Notes:
For expiration of act, see MCL 432.5(3).
For transfer of the Bureau of State Lottery from the Department of Management and Budget to be an autonomous entity within the Department of Treasury, see E.R.O. No. 1991-2, compiled at MCL 12.161 of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
PopularName Notes:
Lottery Act
Notes of Decisions
Northville Downs v. Governor of Michigan, 622 F.3d 579 (6th Cir. 2010).
· cites it 2× “The legislature created a state lottery in 1972, Mich. Comp. Laws § 432.1 et seq., and authorized charitable gambling soon thereafter, Mich.”
People v. Pinkney, 912 N.W.2d 535 (Mich. 2018).
“" And, not surprisingly, the provision is followed by a penalty provision akin to § 937-"A person convicted of violating this section is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or by a fine of not more than $1,000.”
Mooahesh v. Dep't of Treasury, 492 N.W.2d 246 (Mich. Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 2× “In 1987, Kamel Mooahesh, a member of a lottery club, shared one-half of a one million dollar prize won in the state lottery, MCL 432.1 et seq.; MSA 18.969(1) et seq. The prize money has since been paid and will be paid to him until 2006 in $25,000 annual installments.”
Stone Street Capital, Inc v. Bureau of State Lottery, 689 N.W.2d 541 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004).
“] Section 25(9) of the Lottery Act, MCL 432.1 et seq., provides: Except as otherwise provided by state or federal law, the commissioner or an officer or employee of the bureau shall not disclose the name, address, or any other personal information concerning a winner of a prize…”
Watson v. Bureau of State Lottery, 569 N.W.2d 878 (Mich. Ct. App. 1997).
“*644 n Respondents next contend that the Lottery Act, MCL 432.1 et seq.-, MSA 18.969(1) et seq.”
Ramirez v. Bureau of State Lottery, 463 N.W.2d 245 (Mich. Ct. App. 1990).
“In response, defendant argues that the lottery act, MCL 432.1 et seq.; MSA 18.969(1) et seq., is a specific statute which is complete in itself and applies even though the Uniform Commercial Code, MCL 440.”
People v. Taylor, 280 N.W.2d 500 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979).
“1 Pursuant to the enactment of MCL 432.1, et seq.; MSA 18.969(1), et seq.”
In re D'Amico Est., 460 N.W.2d 198 (Mich. 1990).
“] [2] Section 34 of the Lottery Act ( 1972 PA 239 , MCL 432.1 et seq. ; MSA 18.969[1] et seq.”
Miller v. Radikopf, 228 N.W.2d 386 (Mich. 1975).
“Plaintiff also contends that the Lottery Act, 1972 PA 239 ; MCLA 432.1 et seq.; MSA 18.969(1) et seq.”
Nat'l Recovery Sys. v. Kasle, 662 F. Supp. 139 (E.D. Mich. 1987).
“§ 432.1 et seq. creates a state sanctioned lottery and empowers a commissioner to handle the specifics of operating the lottery system.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.