Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 450 / Act 305 of 2000

Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.831

Short title.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

UNIFORM ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ACT


Act 305 of 2000


450.831 Short title.

Sec. 1.

    This act shall be known and may be cited as the "uniform electronic transactions act".

History: 2000, Act 305, Imd. Eff. Oct. 16, 2000

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2012–2026 · leading case: Gillis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gillis v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2012) mied · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws §§ 450.831 -.849. Section 7 of the statute provides: *735 Mich.”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (2016) wva “2009); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 450.831 -.849 (West 2002 & Supp.”
Cain v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC (2015) mied “§ 450.831 et seq., which has been adopted by nearly every state, is a model law developed by the Uniform Law Commissioners that “represents] the first national effort at providing some uniform rules to govern transactions in electronic commerce that should serve in every state.”
Bronson Health Care Group Inc v. Esurance Property & Casualty Ins (2023) michctapp · cites it 2× “3107e(2)(c), so long as doing so complies with the uniform electronic transactions act (UETA), MCL 450.831 et seq. In support of its assertion that Russell electronically signed her PIP selection form, defendant submitted a PIP selection form with Russell’s name typed at the…”
Barnes v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) INC. (2025) mied · cites it 2× “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 450.831 et seq.; Hall v.”
Tiffany Carroll v. Progressive Michigan Insurance Company (2025) michctapp · cites it 2× “(c) Electronically marking the form and providing an electronic signature as provided in the uniform electronic transactions act, 2000 PA 305 , MCL 450.831 to 450.849. If the applicant fails to effectively make an opt-out selection under the statute but “a premium or premium…”
Brent D. Benjamin v. Elizabeth D. Walker (2016) wva “2009); Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 450.831 - .849 (West 2002 & Supp.”
Borsand Family Foundation Inc v. Woodward Avenue Group LLC (2025) michctapp “ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE Under the Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (UETA), MCL 450.831 et seq., “[i]f a law requires a signature, an electronic signature satisfies the law.”
Michigan Ambulatory Surgical Center v. Esurance Insurance Company (2026) michctapp “(c) Electronically marking the form and providing an electronic signature as provided in the uniform electronic transactions act, 2000 PA 305 , MCL 450.831 to 450.849. [Emphasis added.] The choice-of-coverage form contained Howard’s signature in typed form.”
Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hosp v. Esurance Property & Casualty (2026) michctapp “3107e states that “a person must make a selection” in one of three ways, and pertinent here, one way to make an effective selection is by “[e]lectronically marking the form and providing an electronic signature as provided in the uniform electronic transactions act, 2000 PA 305…”
Theodore L Harpham II v. Big Moose Home Inspections Inc (2015) michctapp “Furthermore, any legal action must be brought within one (1) years [sic] from the date of the inspection or will be deemed waived and forever barred.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.