Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.51 (2026)

Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Act 419 of 1919

460.51 Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to public utilities commission.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1952–1991 · leading case: Northville Coach Line, Inc. v. City of Detroit, 150 N.W.2d 772 (Mich. 1967).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Northville Coach Line, Inc. v. City of Detroit, 150 N.W.2d 772 (Mich. 1967). · cites it 2× “[9] PA 1919, No 419, as amended, CL 1948, § 460.51 et seq., as amended (Stat Ann § 22.”

Muskegon Agency, Inc. v. Gen. Tel. Co., 65 N.W.2d 748 (Mich. 1954). “]) and, therefore, is subject to the public utilities commission act PA 1919, No 419 (CL 1948, § 460.51 et seq. [Stat Ann §22.1 et seg.]), as superseded by PA 1939, No 3, as amended by PA 1951, No 275, creating the public-service commission.”

Dome Pipeline Corp. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 439 N.W.2d 700 (Mich. Ct. App. 1989). “, and the public utility commission act, 1919 PA 419 , MCL 460.51 et seq.; MSA 22.1 et seq. We find it unnecessary to review the definitions of *232 "gas” found in these acts because we agree with defendants that the public utility act is not in pari materia with the other acts.”

Attorney Gen. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 472 N.W.2d 53 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “Thus, a determination of the commission’s powers requires an examination of the various statutory enactments pertaining to its authority, specifically, the Public Service Commission act, MCL 460.”

City of Ludington v. Michigan Associated Tel. Co., 52 N.W.2d 605 (Mich. 1952). “PA 1919, No 419 (CL 1948, § 460.51 et seq. [Stat Ann § 22.1 et seq.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.