Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 460 / Act 419 of 1919
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 460.53 (2026)

Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MICHIGAN PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION


Act 419 of 1919


460.53 Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

    Repealed. 1993, Act 354, Imd. Eff. Jan. 14, 1994.

Compiler's Notes:

    The repealed sections pertained to railroad commmission and equipment of vehicles for transporting employees.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1957–1998 · leading case: Champion's Auto Ferry, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 588 N.W.2d 153 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Champion's Auto Ferry, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 588 N.W.2d 153 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “41(a), which similarly grants to the Railroad Commission complete power to regulate any practice of any person, firm, corporation, or association affecting the transportation of persons or property or any service in connection therewith.”
Washtenaw Cnty. Road Commissioners v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 85 N.W.2d 134 (Mich. 1957). “62); CLS 1956, § 460.53 (Stat Ann 1955 Cum Supp § 22.3).”
Sullivan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 287 N.W.2d 188 (Mich. Ct. App. 1979). “13(4). Orders of the former Michigan Railroad Commission and Michigan Public Utilities Commission were reviewable under § 26 of the railroad commission act.”
Ram Broad. of Michigan, Inc v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 317 N.W.2d 295 (Mich. Ct. App. 1982). “_ 1 The Michigan Railroad Commission was abolished and its functions were transferred to the Michigan Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) by MCL 460.53; MSA 22.3 and MCL 460.101; MSA 22.”
Denny's Auto & Towing, Inc. v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co., 343 N.W.2d 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). “See MCL 460.53, 460.101; MSA 22.3, 22.81. In 1939, the utilities commission was abolished and its functions were transferred to the MPSC by MCL 460.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.