Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2604 (2026)
Repealed. 2008, Act 52, Imd. Eff. Mar. 28. 2008.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
MICHIGAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
Act 179 of 1991
484.2604 Repealed. 2008, Act 52, Imd. Eff. Mar. 28. 2008.
Repealed. 2008, Act 52, Imd. Eff. Mar. 28. 2008.
Compiler's Notes:
The repealed section pertained to repeal of act effective December 31, 2009.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1994–2004 · leading case: In Re MCI Telecomm. Complaint, 596 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 1999).
In Re MCI Telecomm. Complaint, 596 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 1999). “Sections 312a and 312b were quoted above, and the third relevant section is § 604(2) of that act, stated as follows: Section 312b of Act No.”
Ameritech Michigan v. Psc Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 658 N.W.2d 849 (Mich. Ct. App. 2003). “MCL 484.2604, as amended by 2000 PA 295 , effective July 17, 2000.”
In Re Complaint of Michigan Cable Telecomm. Ass'n Against Ameritech Michigan, 615 N.W.2d 255 (Mich. Ct. App. 2000). “1 The mta was to be automatically repealed on January 1, 1996, under MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1469(604), before it was amended by 1995 PA 216 , which provided a prospective repeal date of January 1, 2001.”
Ameritech Michigan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 583 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “1991 PA 179 ultimately lapsed after the instant appeals were filed, pursuant to a “sunset” expiration date of January 1, 1996, set forth in § 604 of the act, MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1469(604). In its place, the Legislature has now enacted a new Michigan Telecommunications Act, 1995…”
In Re Quality of Serv. Standards for Regulated Telecomm. Servs., 516 N.W.2d 142 (Mich. Ct. App. 1994). “These principles have particular force where, as here, the agency has taken action pursuant to experimental legislation — by its terms, the Telecommunications Act expires on January 1, 1996, MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1649(604) — to which the courts will give particular deference.”
In Re Procedure & Format for Filing Tariffs Under the Michigan Telecomm. Act, 534 N.W.2d 194 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). “In light of the hundreds of services involved, and the cost and time required for such a formal undertaking, we cannot attribute such an intent to the Legislature.”
GTE North Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 544 N.W.2d 678 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1469(604). The only place where Act 179 expressly addresses the subject of intraLATA dialing parity is a provision in § 202(f) of the act regarding various matters to be included in a report from the psc to the Legislature and the Governor due January 1,…”
In Re Martinez Complaint, 649 N.W.2d 403 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002). “MCL 484.2604, amended by 2000 PA 295 , immediate effect, July 17, 2000.”
Verizon North, Inc v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 677 N.W.2d 918 (Mich. Ct. App. 2004). “MCL 484.2604 2 The tslric is either the “total forward-looking cost of a telecommunication service, relevant group of services, or basic network component, using current least cost technology that would be required if the provider had never offered the service,” or the “total…”
Ameritech Michigan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 460 Mich. 396 (Mich. 1999). “[MCL 484.2604(2); MSA 22.1469(604)(2).] Our first task is one of statutory construction.”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2604(1) — 1 case
Ameritech Michigan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 583 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “1991 PA 179 ultimately lapsed after the instant appeals were filed, pursuant to a “sunset” expiration date of January 1, 1996, set forth in § 604 of the act, MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1469(604). In its place, the Legislature has now enacted a new Michigan Telecommunications Act, 1995…”
— Mich. Comp. Laws § 484.2604(2) — 3 cases
In Re MCI Telecomm. Complaint, 596 N.W.2d 164 (Mich. 1999). “Sections 312a and 312b were quoted above, and the third relevant section is § 604(2) of that act, stated as follows: Section 312b of Act No.”
Ameritech Michigan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 583 N.W.2d 458 (Mich. Ct. App. 1998). “1991 PA 179 ultimately lapsed after the instant appeals were filed, pursuant to a “sunset” expiration date of January 1, 1996, set forth in § 604 of the act, MCL 484.2604; MSA 22.1469(604). In its place, the Legislature has now enacted a new Michigan Telecommunications Act, 1995…”
Ameritech Michigan v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 460 Mich. 396 (Mich. 1999). “[MCL 484.2604(2); MSA 22.1469(604)(2).] Our first task is one of statutory construction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.