Mich. Comp. Laws » Michigan Compiled Laws / Chapter 500 / Act 218 of 1956
Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.2484 (2026)

Insurance commissioner; regulatory powers.

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

THE INSURANCE CODE OF 1956


Act 218 of 1956


500.2484 Insurance commissioner; regulatory powers.

Sec. 2484.

    The commissioner may make reasonable rules and regulations necessary to effect the purposes of this chapter.

History: 1956, Act 218, Eff. Jan. 1, 1957

PopularName Notes:

Act 218

AdminRule Notes:

    R 500.901 et seq. and R 500.1201 et seq. of the Michigan Administrative Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1978–2010 · leading case: Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 267 N.W.2d 72 (Mich. 1978). · cites it 2× “The Legislature and/or the Commissioner of Insurance (pursuant to his present rule-making authority, MCL 500.2484; MSA 24.12484), give substantial meaning to the statutory standards "Rates shall not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory".”
Ins. Inst. v. Com'r, Fin. & Ins., 785 N.W.2d 67 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “[18] In addition, MCL 500.2484 (Chapter 24) and MCL 500.2674 (Chapter 26) provide: "The commissioner may make reasonable rules and regulations necessary to effect the purposes of this chapter.”
Ins. Inst. v. Comm'r of the Off. of Fin. & Ins. Servs., 486 Mich. 370 (Mich. 2010). · cites it 2× “[ 18 ] In addition, MCL 500.2484 (Chapter 24) and MCL 500.2674 (Chapter 26) provide: “The commissioner may make reasonable rules and regulations necessary to effect the purposes of this chapter.”
Shavers v. Attorney Gen., 315 N.W.2d 130 (Mich. 1982). “The Legislature and/or the Commissioner of Insurance (pursuant to his present rule-making authority, MCL 500.2484; MSA 24.12484), give substantial meaning to the statutory standards 'Rates shall not be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory’.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.