Michigan Compiled Laws

Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5021 (2026)

Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961

Act 236 of 1961

600.5021 Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

Repealed. 2012, Act 370, Eff. July 1, 2013.

Compiler's Notes:

The repealed section pertained to conduct of arbitration.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 11 cases, 1982–2015 · leading case: Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch. v. Gavin, 331 N.W.2d 418 (Mich. 1982).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Detroit Auto. Inter-Ins. Exch. v. Gavin, 331 N.W.2d 418 (Mich. 1982). · cites it 2× “9(1)(c), providing that a court shall vacate an arbitration award when the arbitrators "exceeded their powers", restates verbatim § 12(a)(3) of the uniform act.”

Fette v. Peters Constr. Co, 871 N.W.2d 877 (Mich. Ct. App. 2015). “Former MCL 600.5021 of the MAA provided that “arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the supreme court.”

Gordon Sel-Way, Inc. v. Spence Bros., 475 N.W.2d 704 (Mich. 1991). “MCL 600.5021; MSA 27A.5021 specifies that statutory arbitrations are to be conducted in accordance with the rules of the Michigan Supreme Court.”

Brucker v. Mckinlay Transp., Inc, 557 N.W.2d 536 (Mich. 1997). · cites it 2× “MCL 600.5021; MSA 27A.5021 provides that “arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the rules of the supreme court,” and MCR 3.”

Savers Prop. & Cas. Ins. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins., 748 F.3d 708 (6th Cir. 2014). “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5021 (repealed 2012); Mich.”

Konal v. Forlini, 596 N.W.2d 630 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “” *74 Dick v Dick, 210 Mich App 576, 588 ; 534 NW2d 185 (1995), citing MCL 600.5021; MSA 27A.5021; MCR 3.602. Judicial review of arbitration awards is limited.”

Dohanyos v. Detrex Corp., 550 N.W.2d 608 (Mich. Ct. App. 1996). “An arbitration award may be vacated if (1) the award was procured by corruption, fraud, or other undue means; (2) *175 there was evident partiality by an arbitrator, corruption by an arbitrator, or misconduct prejudicing a party’s rights; (3) the arbitrator exceeded granted…”

St. Luke's Hosp. v. SMS Comput. Sys. Inc., 785 F. Supp. 1243 (E.D. Mich. 1991). “The taxing of the arbitrator’s fees and expenses, under MCL 600.5021 and MCR 3.602(M), will be denied.”

Brucker v. Mckinlay Transp., Inc, 537 N.W.2d 474 (Mich. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “The applicable court rule provides the court with three options only: vacating, modifying, or correcting the award. MCR 3.602(J), (K). The court's power even to vacate, modify, or correct the arbitration award is very limited.”

Jaguar Trading Ltd. P'ship v. Presler, 808 N.W.2d 495 (Mich. Ct. App. 2010). “602(A); MCL 600.5021; Brucker v McKinlay Transp, Inc, 454 Mich 8, 16-17 ; 557 NW2d 536 (1997).”

Savers Prop.& Cas. v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. (6th Cir. 2014). “See Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.5021 (repealed 2012); Mich.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.