Michigan Compiled Laws
Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.847 (2026)
Powers of probate court in exercise of jurisdiction.
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MI-LEGlegislature.mi.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
REVISED JUDICATURE ACT OF 1961
Act 236 of 1961
600.847 Powers of probate court in exercise of jurisdiction.
Sec. 847.
In the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the probate court by law, the probate court shall have the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the probate court's jurisdiction and decisions.
History: Add. 1978, Act 543, Eff. July 1, 1979
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1983–2019 · leading case: In Re Nestorovski Est., 769 N.W.2d 720 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).
In Re Nestorovski Est., 769 N.W.2d 720 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009). “However, when the Legislature enacted the Revised Probate Code, it unquestionably expanded the powers of the probate courts by contemporaneously enacting MCL 600.847, which provides as follows: In the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the probate court by law, the probate court…”
In Re Butterfield Est., 341 N.W.2d 453 (Mich. 1983). “" MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847. This section went into effect on July 1, 1979, before the probate court order in question was entered on July 16, 1979.”
In Re MacOmber, 461 N.W.2d 671 (Mich. 1990). “MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847 provides in pertinent part: In the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the probate court by law, the probate court shall have the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders *390 to fully effectuate the…”
Noble v. McNerney, 419 N.W.2d 424 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847 provides: *607 In the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the probate court by law, the probate court shall have the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the probate court's…”
In Re Humphrey Est., 367 N.W.2d 873 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985). “) Finally, MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847, a complementary amendment to the Revised Judicature Act, provides that the probate court has "the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the probate court's…”
In Re Williams Est., 417 N.W.2d 556 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847. We conclude that Rose is estopped from asserting her legal status.”
In Re Hillier Est., 473 N.W.2d 811 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991). “However, as noted by the Johnson Court, MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847, granted the probate court "the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the probate court’s jurisdiction and decisions.”
In Re Powell Est., 408 N.W.2d 525 (Mich. Ct. App. 1987). “While the probate court may have exclusive jurisdiction to appoint a conservator, MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847 and MCL 700.22; MSA 27.”
In Re Reiswitz, 600 N.W.2d 135 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999). “Similarly, MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847 provides that probate courts “have the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the probate court’s jurisdiction and decisions.”
In Re Rice Est., 360 N.W.2d 587 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “" Along with the RPC, the Revised Judicature Act states: "In the exercise of jurisdiction vested in the probate court by law, the probate court shall have the same powers as the circuit court to hear and determine any matter and make any proper orders to fully effectuate the…”
Gowthorpe v. Page, 418 Mich. 241 (Mich. 1983). “” MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847. This section went into effect on July 1, 1979, before the probate court order in question was entered on July 16, 1979.”
In Re Johnson Est., 394 N.W.2d 136 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “574(5) applied to this case, the probate court was, nevertheless, vested with all of the equitable powers of the circuit court pursuant to MCL 600.847; MSA 27A.847 and could thus consider his petition as a matter of equity.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.