Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 10.10 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1961 c 561 s 17]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–2012 · leading case: State v. Earnest, 293 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1980).
State v. Earnest, 293 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 8× “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.10(a), at 424 (1978); The "Act of Grace" theory, which states that a parollee or probationer has no right to expect parole or probation and that, if he accepts the favor of parole or probation, he accepts it subject to any subsequent surveillance…”
State v. Johnson, 813 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2012). · cites it 3× “§ 10.10 (Supp.2011-2012). 3 The Iowa Supreme Court rejected Samson as a sharp departure from prior Court decisions and decided the validity of a warrantless search of a parolee’s motel room under its own constitution.”
In re the Welfare of M.L.M., 813 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. 2012). “Specifically, subdivisions 3 and 4 provide that the DNA profile may be used only for criminal identification purposes.”
Minn. Stat. § 10.10(a): 1 case
State v. Earnest, 293 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1980). “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.10(a), at 424 (1978); The "Act of Grace" theory, which states that a parollee or probationer has no right to expect parole or probation and that, if he accepts the favor of parole or probation, he accepts it subject to any subsequent surveillance…”
Minn. Stat. § 10.10(b): 1 case
State v. Earnest, 293 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1980). “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.10(a), at 424 (1978); The "Act of Grace" theory, which states that a parollee or probationer has no right to expect parole or probation and that, if he accepts the favor of parole or probation, he accepts it subject to any subsequent surveillance…”
Minn. Stat. § 10.10(c): 3 cases
State v. Johnson, 813 N.W.2d 1 (Minn. 2012). “§ 10.10 (Supp.2011-2012). 3 The Iowa Supreme Court rejected Samson as a sharp departure from prior Court decisions and decided the validity of a warrantless search of a parolee’s motel room under its own constitution.”
State v. Earnest, 293 N.W.2d 365 (Minn. 1980). “LaFave, Search and Seizure § 10.10(a), at 424 (1978); The "Act of Grace" theory, which states that a parollee or probationer has no right to expect parole or probation and that, if he accepts the favor of parole or probation, he accepts it subject to any subsequent surveillance…”
In re the Welfare of M.L.M., 813 N.W.2d 26 (Minn. 2012). “Specifically, subdivisions 3 and 4 provide that the DNA profile may be used only for criminal identification purposes.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.