Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 105. DIVISION OF WATERS, SOILS AND MINERALS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 105.41 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1990 c 391 art 10 s 4; renumbered 103G.261; 103G.271 subd 6]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1963–1987 · leading case: Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources, 300 N.W.2d 769 (Minn. 1980).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Crookston Cattle Co. v. Minnesota Dep't of Nat. Resources, 300 N.W.2d 769 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 24× “For this purpose, *772 the City acquired title to land 12 miles east of the City for use as a well site and made application to the DNR for permits for well construction pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 105.41 (1978). Six months after the City made its application, the Company and its…”
United States v. Reserve Mining Co., 380 F. Supp. 11 (D. Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 105.41 requires a permit from the Commissioner of Natural Resources before any entity can appropriate or use any waters of the State: The commissioner may give such permit subject to such conditions as he may find advisable or necessary in the public interest.”
State v. Kuluvar, 123 N.W.2d 699 (Minn. 1963). “6 §§ 105.41,105.42, and 105.44, subd. 8. 7 § 105.”
State v. Feehan, 412 N.W.2d 309 (Minn. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “James Paul Feehan appeals from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict finding him guilty of working in protected waters without a permit in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 105.41 and 105.42 (1984). On appeal, he raises a number of issues relating to admission of evidence at…”
United States v. Reserve Mining Co., 394 F. Supp. 233 (D. Minn. 1974). · cites it 2× “§ 105.41, states in part that: It shall be unlawful for the state, any person, partnership, or association, private or public corporation, .”
Reserve Mining Co. v. Env't Prot. Agency, 514 F.2d 492 (8th Cir. 1975). “07(1) is also violated by Reserve’s discharge of wastes from its pilot plant into Lake Superior without a permit; 6) that the evidence is, insufficient to justify liability under Minn.Stat.Ann. § 105.41, which makes unlawful the appropriation of state water without a permit; and…”
City of St. Cloud v. Pappenfus, 176 N.W.2d 85 (Minn. 1970). “74 but § 105.41 is applicable. We agree with the trial court that these statutes do not govern here and that the city was authorized to proceed under c.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.