Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 2. TERRITORIAL DIVISIONS
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 2.05 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1957 [Repealed, Ex1959 c 45 s 70]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1980–2003 · leading case: Lockwood Motors, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 162 F.R.D. 569 (D. Minnesota 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lockwood Motors, Inc. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 162 F.R.D. 569 (D. Minnesota 1995). · cites it 2× “Although GM maintains that Lockwood’s injury is not similar or typical to the purported injury of the other dealer members, the degree to which Lockwood’s alleged injury differs from the other class members is not an issue of threshold standing, but rather is properly assessed…”
State v. Guminga, 395 N.W.2d 344 (Minn. 1986). · cites it 2× “Model Penal Code § 2.05, comment 1 (1985). The dissent's citation to an article by Sayre, Criminal Responsibility for the Acts of Another, 43 Harv.”
Hodgin v. Conlin (In Re Conlin), 294 B.R. 88 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2003). · cites it 2× “The subscription agreement for partnership signature page, signed by both Marvin and Clara Hodgin, contains the following recitals, in part, and among others: (b) I have read the Partnership Agreement, including its exhibits, in its entirety and in particular the provisions…”
Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Tech., Inc., 648 F. Supp. 661 (D. Minnesota 1986). “1 Milgrim § 2.05[2] at 2-59. Here, the uncontroverted testimony of Dr.”
Berg v. Xerxes-Southdale Off. Bldg. Co., 290 N.W.2d 612 (Minn. 1980). “Digest 2d, Fraud, § 2.05 (3d ed. 1979). On remand, evidence will have to be received as to the market value of the limited partnership interest, assuming the disclosure of the negative cash flow.”
J.J. v. Luckow, 578 N.W.2d 17 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 2× “Digest Limitation of Actions § 2.05(a) (4th ed.1996) (certain disabilities suspend the running of the period of limitation, but "[t]he period is extended in no case for more than one year after the disability ceases"); see also Lelm by Lelm v.”
State v. Strong, 294 N.W.2d 319 (Minn. 1980). “*320 Most crimes are not strict liability offenses and most commentators have argued that the legislature should never use strict liability for crimes carrying a sentence of imprisonment and the moral condemnation going with such crimes.”
Tjernlund v. Kadrie, 425 N.W.2d 292 (Minn. Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2× “” Section 2.05 of the limited partnership agreements defines the Net Proceeds of Financing as: [T]he gross proceeds of any borrowings of the Partnership less the sum of: (i) any amounts used to repay then existing loans of the Partnership and to pay and provide for all debts and…”
Op. Atty. Gen. 59a-30 (Minn. Att'y Gen. 1996). · cites it 4× “Recently the Charter Commission submitted a proposed charter amendment regarding council member attendance at regular council meetings If amended, Section 2.05 of the charter would read, in relevant part, as follows: Section 2.”
— Minn. Stat. § 2.05(a) — 1 case
J.J. v. Luckow, 578 N.W.2d 17 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998). “Digest Limitation of Actions § 2.05(a) (4th ed.1996) (certain disabilities suspend the running of the period of limitation, but "[t]he period is extended in no case for more than one year after the disability ceases"); see also Lelm by Lelm v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.