Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 260C. JUVENILE SAFETY AND PLACEMENT
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 260C.405 (2026)

Violation Of An Order For Protection

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subdivision 1.Violation; penalty.

Whenever an order for protection is granted pursuant to section 260C.148 or 260C.201, subdivision 3, restraining the person or excluding the person from the residence, and the respondent or person to be restrained knows of the order, violation of the order for protection is a misdemeanor.

Subd. 2.Arrest.

A peace officer shall arrest without a warrant and take into custody a person whom the peace officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order granted pursuant to section 260C.148 or 260C.201, subdivision 3, restraining the person or excluding the person from the residence, if the existence of the order can be verified by the officer.

Subd. 3.Contempt.

A violation of an order for protection shall also constitute contempt of court and the person violating the order shall be subject to the penalties for contempt.

Subd. 4.Order to show cause.

Upon the filing of an affidavit by the agency or any peace officer, alleging that the respondent has violated an order for protection granted pursuant to section 260C.148 or 260C.201, subdivision 3, the court may issue an order to the respondent, requiring the respondent to appear and show cause within 14 days why the respondent should not be found in contempt of court. The hearing may be held by the court in any county in which the child or respondent temporarily or permanently resides at the time of the alleged violation.

A peace officer is not liable under section 609.43, clause (1), for failure to perform a duty required by subdivision 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2013–2015 · leading case: State v. Ramos, 2013 NMSC 031 (N.M. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ramos, 2013 NMSC 031 (N.M. 2013). · cites it 2× “15b (2002); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 260C.405 (2008); Mo. Ann.”
State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn Jones, 869 N.W.2d 24 (Minn. 2015). · cites it 2× “, Minn. Stat. § 260C.405, subd, 3 (2014) (order for protection); Minn.”
State v. Ramos, 2013 NMSC 31 (N.M. 2013). “15b (2002); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 260C.405 (2008); Mo. Ann.”
State v. Ramos (N.M. 2013). “15b (2002); Minn. Stat. Ann. § 260C.405 (2008); Mo. Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.