Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 325.905 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

MS 1978 [Renumbered 325F.67]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1975–1992 · leading case: Witzel v. Chartered Sys. Corp. of NY, 490 F. Supp. 343 (D. Minnesota 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Witzel v. Chartered Sys. Corp. of NY, 490 F. Supp. 343 (D. Minnesota 1980). · cites it 2× “The remaining counts (7 through 16) are premised on common law theories such as fraud, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence, and on alleged violations of certain Minnesota statutes ( Minn. Stat. §§ 325.905 ; 325.79, subd. 1; 325.”

Kronebusch v. MVBA Harvestore Sys., 488 N.W.2d 490 (Minn. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “” In 1967, it was renumbered Minn.Stat. § 325.905 under the title "Regulation of Manufacturers and Sales.”

Jenson v. Cont'l Fin. Corp., 404 F. Supp. 806 (D. Minnesota 1975). · cites it 2× “) and Minnesota Flass Advertising Act, Minn.Stat. § 325.905 (1973 Supp.). 10 . Affidavit of Charles Zimmerman, Plaintiffs’ counsel.”

Fox Chem. Co. v. Amsoil, Inc., 445 F. Supp. 1355 (D. Minnesota 1978). “Unfortunately, this state statute does not contain a statute of limitations thus requiring a decision as to which of Minnesota’s two general statutes of limitation would apply to this statutory cause of action.”

Jenson v. Cont'l Fin. Corp., 404 F. Supp. 792 (D. Minnesota 1975). · cites it 2× “Count V alleges a common law breach of a fiduciary duty. Count VI alleges consumer fraud under the Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act, Minn.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.