Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 80A. REGULATION OF SECURITIES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 80A.03 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 2006 c 196 art 1 s 51,52]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1975–2003 · leading case: Stephenson v. Deutsche Bank AG, 282 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (D. Minnesota 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Stephenson v. Deutsche Bank AG, 282 F. Supp. 2d 1032 (D. Minnesota 2003). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 80A.03 is the Minnesota counterpart to Section 9.”
In Re Flight Transp. Corp. SEC. Litig., 593 F. Supp. 612 (D. Minnesota 1984). · cites it 10× “Count V is dismissed insofar as it alleges violations of Minn.Stat. § 80A.03. IT IS SO ORDERED. NOTES [1] Judge Weiner, a district court judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.”
Hagert v. Glickman, Lurie, Eiger & Co., 520 F. Supp. 1028 (D. Minnesota 1981). · cites it 6× “Minn.Stat. § 80A.03 provides in relevant part, “It is unlawful for any person to effect any transaction in, or to induce the purchase or sale of any security by means of any manipulative, deceptive or other fraudulent device or contrivance, including any fictitious quotation.”
Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co., 335 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1983). · cites it 4× “01 on any person who sells such a security and on “any person who violates section 80A.03 in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.”
Burns v. Ersek, 591 F. Supp. 837 (D. Minnesota 1984). “01 or § 80A.03 in connection with the purchase or sale of any security.”
Antinore v. Reavis & McGrath, 593 F. Supp. 612 (D. Minnesota 1984). · cites it 8× “Count V is dismissed insofar as it alleges violations of Minn.Stat. § 80A.03. IT IS SO ORDERED. . Judge Weiner, a district court judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, is sitting by designation.”
Jenson v. Cont'l Fin. Corp., 404 F. Supp. 806 (D. Minnesota 1975). “Ü1 and § 80A.03 (1973 Supp.). 9 . Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act, Minn.”
Kovatovich v. Barnett, 406 N.W.2d 516 (Minn. 1987). · cites it 2× “It is also illegal to “effect any transaction in, or to induce the purchase or sale of any security by means of any manipulative, deceptive or other fraudulent device or contrivance * * Minn.Stat. § 80A.03 (1986). A “security” is: [A]ny note; stock; treasury stock; bond;…”
Jenson v. Cont'l Fin. Corp., 404 F. Supp. 792 (D. Minnesota 1975). “01 and § 80A.03 (1973 Supp.). Count IV alleges the sale of unregistered securities in violation of the Minnesota Securities Act, Minn.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.