Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 363.10 (2026)

[Repealed]

✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[Repealed, 1982 c 501 s 26; 1983 c 247 s 219]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: City of Minneapolis v. Richardson, 239 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1976).
City of Minneapolis v. Richardson, 239 N.W.2d 197 (Minn. 1976). “(§ 363.10, allowing by implication appeals to this court as provided in Rule 103.”
Lamb v. Vill. of Bagley, 310 N.W.2d 508 (Minn. 1981). · cites it 2× “It follows that if the commissioner is unsatisfied with the result of review in the district court, the commissioner may appeal to this court pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 363.10 (1980). Police Chief Francis LaRoque died before the Department of Human Rights hearing and was dismissed…”
State ex rel. Balfour v. Bergeron, 187 N.W.2d 680 (Minn. 1971). “As provided for in § 363.10, incorporating Minn. St. 1965, § 605.”
Cont'l Can Co. ex rel. Wilson v. State, 297 N.W.2d 241 (Minn. 1980). · cites it 2× “The Department appeals the district court’s decision pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 363.10 (1978). Hawkins filed an amicus brief with permission of this Court.”
Doll v. Trellis Walnut Towers LLC, No. 0:24-cv-00136 (D. Minn. Sept. 30, 2024). · cites it 2× “It quotes a paragraph of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn. Stat. § 363.10 subdiv. 1(2), and cross-cites 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.