Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 566.02 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1998 c 253 s 80]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1945–1990 · leading case: Yager v. Thompson, 352 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984).
Yager v. Thompson, 352 N.W.2d 71 (Minn. Ct. App. 1984). “Did the trial court abuse its discretion in granting injunctive relief? ANALYSIS I The Thompsons claim the sole remedy available to Yager for recovering possession of the bowling alley was the statutory action for forcible entry and unlawful de-tainer.”
Minneapolis Pub. Hous. Auth. v. Greene, 463 N.W.2d 558 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990). “Section 566.02 says: A seizure under section 609.”
Berg v. Wiley, 264 N.W.2d 145 (Minn. 1978). “8 Where speedier action than provided in §§ 566.02 to 566.17 seems necessary because of threatened destruction of the property or other exigent circumstances, a temporary restraining order under Rule 65, Rules of Civil Procedure, and law enforcement protection are available to…”
Keller v. Henvit, 18 N.W.2d 544 (Minn. 1945). “Section 566.02 (Mason St. 1927, § 9148), provides: “When any person has made unlawful or forcible entry into lands or tenements, and detains the same, or, having peaceably entered, unlawfully detains the same, he shall be fined, and the person entitled to the premises may…”
Priordale Mall Investors v. Farrington, 390 N.W.2d 412 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “04 the summary remedy of §§ 566.02 to 566.17 is made unavailable against any tenant having been "in quiet possession for three years next before the filing of the complaint * * *.”
White Earth Hous. Auth. v. Schwabe, 375 N.W.2d 568 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985). “See Minn.Stat. § 566.02 (1984). In University Community Properties Inc.”
McPherson v. Univ. Motors, Inc., 193 N.W.2d 616 (Minn. 1972). “1969, §§ 566.02 to 566.09. 2 See, Minn. St. 566.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.