Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 581. MORTGAGES; FORECLOSURE BY ACTION
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 581.03 (2026)

Judgment, Transcript

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Judgment shall be entered, under the direction of the court, adjudging the amount due, with costs and disbursements, and the sale of the mortgaged premises, or some part thereof, to satisfy such amount, and directing the sheriff to proceed to sell the same according to the provisions of law relating to the sale of real estate on execution, and to make report to the court. A certified transcript of the judgment shall be delivered to the sheriff, and shall be the sheriff's authority for making the sale.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1944–2014 · leading case: Minnwest Bank Cent. v. Flagship Props. LLC, 689 N.W.2d 295 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Minnwest Bank Cent. v. Flagship Props. LLC, 689 N.W.2d 295 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “In a foreclosure by action, judgments are governed by Minn.Stat. § 581.03 (2002), which provides: Judgment shall be entered, under the direction of the court, adjudging the amount due, with costs and disbursements, and the sale of the mortgaged premises, or some part thereof, to…”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Hughes Dev. Co., 684 F. Supp. 616 (D. Minnesota 1988). · cites it 4× “The FDIC has moved for summary judgment on its action for foreclosure of the Cathedral Court and Lombard mortgages pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 581.03, 581.09 and 582.30 (1986).”
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Erlandson, 821 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “Minn.Stat. § 581.03 (2010). Upon the report of sale and confirmation of the sale by the court, "the court administrator shall enter satisfaction of the judgment to the extent of the sum bid for the premises, less expenses and costs.”
Geneva Jpm 2003-pm1, LLC v. Geneva Fscx I, LLC, 843 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “” Minnesota Statutes section 581.03 (2012) states, “Judgment shall be entered, under the direction of the court, adjudging the amount due, with costs and disbursements, and the sale of the mortgaged premises, or some part thereof, to satisfy such amount.”
Latenser v. John Latenser & Sons, Inc., 347 N.W.2d 486 (Minn. 1984). · cites it 2× “00 plus interest,” and for an order “directing the sale of said mortgaged premises” as provided by Minn.Stat. § 581.03 (1982), “together with application of the proceeds of sale after deduction of the cost thereof, to the amount adjudged to be due.”
Olmsted Cnty. Bank & Trust Co. v. Pesch, 16 N.W.2d 470 (Minn. 1944). “The claim of the appellants is that, since Pesch was the original obligor, his acquisition of these 15 bonds constituted a cancellation of them and inured to the benefit of the other bondholders and that consequently he should not share in the distribution. A question as to the…”
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Assocs. Ltd. P'ship, 819 F. Supp. 845 (D. Minnesota 1993). · cites it 2× “Catherine Park, according to the recorded plat thereof, Ramsey County, Minnesota and other property encumbered by the mortgage is hereby directed to be sold as provided by Minn.Stat. §§ 581.03- and 336.9-501 by the Sheriff of Ramsey County and the application of the proceeds…”
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger (Minn. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 4× “Porada and Kurdyumova’s claims based on Minn. Stat. § 581.03 suffers from the same defect.”
Fed. Deposit Ins. v. Hughes Dev. Co., 938 F.2d 889 (8th Cir. 1991). “See Minn.Stat.Ann. §§ 581.03, 582.01 (attorneys' fees) (West 1988); Spencer v.”
Sievert v. LaMarca, 383 N.W.2d 368 (Minn. Ct. App. 1986). “However, because of the two appeals and the history of this litigation we specifically direct that the trial court observe, in addition to Minn.Stat. 581.03, the following directions if it becomes necessary to direct foreclosure: 1) that the trial court direct the method of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.