Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 620.19 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1963 c 753 art 2 s 17]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8
cases, 1962–1965 · leading case: State v. Clark, 134 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1965).
State v. Clark, 134 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 1965). “1961, § 620.19, entitled “Uttering.” The information filed on July 27, 1962, contains the same averments as the complaint but charges defendant with second-degree forgery and mentions Minn.”
State v. Owens, 129 N.W.2d 284 (Minn. 1964). “1961, § 620.19. Section 620.19 declares that one who utters a forged instrument “[sjhall be guilty of forgery in the same degree as if he had forged the same.”
State v. Briton, 121 N.W.2d 577 (Minn. 1963). “10 but appeared to allege the crime of “uttering” governed by § 620.19. Defendant also stated that the information was duplicitous in alleging more than one offense.”
State v. Clark, 131 N.W.2d 204 (Minn. 1964). “1961, § 620.19. Section 620.19 declares that one who utters a forged instrument “[s]hall be guilty of forgery in the same degree as if he had forged the same.”
State Ex Rel. Masters v. Tahash, 123 N.W.2d 600 (Minn. 1963). “Where the act of uttering under § 620.19 is alleged, the degree of forgery charged must be ascertained by reference to the sections defining forgery in the various degrees and prescribing the punishment therefor.”
State v. Polk, 116 N.W.2d 540 (Minn. 1962). “10, defining forgery in the second degree, and § 620.19, having to do with uttering a forged instrument, both of which sections require criminal intent as an element of the offense.”
State v. Lehn, 134 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. 1965). “Uttering a forged instrument is a separate crime under § 620.19, which section declares that one who utters a forged instrument “[s]hall be guilty of forgery in the same degree as if he had forged the same.”
State v. Schultz, 136 N.W.2d 534 (Minn. 1965). “, a corporation as aforesaid, and others to the complainant unknown, might be affected and injured; contrary to the form of the statute * * * the same being Section 620.19 1 and 620.10, 2 said acts constituting Forgery, *484 2nd degree, and against the peace and dignity of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.