Minn. Stat. » CHAPTER 645. INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND RULES
Minnesota Statutes

Minn. Stat. § 645.13 (2026)

Time; Publication For Successive Weeks

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the term "successive weeks" is used in any law providing for the publishing of notices, the word "weeks" shall be construed as calendar weeks. The publication upon any day of such weeks shall be sufficient publication for that week, but at least five days shall elapse between each publication. At least the number of weeks specified in "successive weeks" shall elapse between the first publication and the day for the happening of the event for which the publication is made.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–1996 · leading case: Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 238 N.W.2d 882 (Minn. 1976).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Kokesh v. City of Hopkins, 238 N.W.2d 882 (Minn. 1976). “15 provides in part: “Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed and fixed by law, such time, except as otherwise provided in sections…”
State v. Jackson, 557 N.W.2d 552 (Minn. 1996). “: Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed and fixed by law, the time, except as otherwise provided in sections 645.13 and 645.14,…”
Twp. Bd. v. Lewis, 234 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 1975). “15 is the applicable statute governing the computation of time for the purposes of this case: “Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed…”
Tp. Bd. of Lake Val. Tp., Traverse Cty. v. Lewis, 234 N.W.2d 815 (Minn. 1975). “15 is the applicable statute governing the computation of time for the purposes of this case: "Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed…”
Color-Ad Packaging, Inc. v. Kapak Indus., Inc., 172 N.W.2d 568 (Minn. 1969). “15 provides: “Where the performance or doing of any act, duty, matter, payment, or thing is ordered or directed, and the period of time or duration for the performance or doing thereof is prescribed and fixed by law, such time, except as otherwise provided in sections 645.13 and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.