Minnesota Statutes
Minn. Stat. § 9.32 (2026)
[Repealed]
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MN-REVrevisor.mn.gov (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
[Repealed, 1957 c 804 s 10]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney, 709 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. 2006).
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Rooney, 709 N.W.2d 263 (Minn. 2006). “ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions § 9.32 (1991) (listing the lack of a dishonest or selfish motive as a possible mitigating factor).”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Fairbairn, 802 N.W.2d 734 (Minn. 2011). “2d at 272 (citing ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions § 9.32 (1991) (stating that the lack of a dishonest or selfish motive is a possible mitigating factor)).”
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Farley, 771 N.W.2d 857 (Minn. 2009). “Bar Ass’n, Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions § 9.32 (1991). 3 . See, e.g., In re Davis, 740 N.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez, 997 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 9.32 (c) (West 2022); Acts 2007, 80th Leg.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez, 12 N.W.3d 191 (Minn. 2024). “Penal Code § 9.32(2) (1984). That statute was amended in 2007 to expressly provide that, so long as certain conditions are satisfied, there is no duty to retreat from a threat of unlawful force.”
In re Disciplinary Action Against Upin, 904 N.W.2d 645 (Minn. 2017). “32 (1991) (listing the lack of a dishonest or selfish motive as a possible mitigating factor)), We note, however, that even if respondent lacked an obvious selfish motive in misappropriating the funds, respondent benefitted, at least in part and indirectly, from his misconduct:…”
Minn. Stat. § 9.32(2): 2 cases
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez, 997 N.W.2d 557 (Minn. Ct. App. 2023). “§ 9.32 (c) (West 2022); Acts 2007, 80th Leg.”
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez, 12 N.W.3d 191 (Minn. 2024). “Penal Code § 9.32(2) (1984). That statute was amended in 2007 to expressly provide that, so long as certain conditions are satisfied, there is no duty to retreat from a threat of unlawful force.”
Minn. Stat. § 9.32(c): 1 case
State of Minnesota v. Julian Daniel Valdez, 12 N.W.3d 191 (Minn. 2024). “Penal Code § 9.32(2) (1984). That statute was amended in 2007 to expressly provide that, so long as certain conditions are satisfied, there is no duty to retreat from a threat of unlawful force.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.