Mo. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 407
Missouri Revised Statutes

Mo. Rev. Stat. § 407.070 (2026)

Petition to extend return date, when and where filed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

  407.070.  Petition to extend return date, when and where filed. — At any time before the return date specified in a civil investigative demand issued under section 407.040, or within twenty days after the civil investigative demand has been served, whichever period is shorter, a petition to extend the return date for, or to modify or set aside the civil investigative demand, stating good cause, may be filed in the circuit court of the county where the parties reside or in the circuit court of Cole County.

­­--------

(L. 1967 p. 607 § 7, A.L. 1973 H.B. 55, A.L. 1986 S.B. 685)

Effective 5-01-86

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1977–2025 · leading case: Lewandowski v. Danforth, 547 S.W.2d 470 (Mo. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewandowski v. Danforth, 547 S.W.2d 470 (Mo. 1977). · cites it 4× “1973, reads as follows: “At any time before the return date specified in the demand, or within twenty days after the demand has been served, whichever period is shorter, a petition to extend the return date for, or to modify or set aside the demand, stating good cause, may be…”
State ex rel. Koster v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc., 461 S.W.3d 851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 5× “§ 407.070. In such a petition, the recipient may state its objections to the CID, and why it believes that the CID is unreasonable.”
State ex rel. Ashcroft v. Goldberg, 608 S.W.2d 385 (Mo. 1980). · cites it 2× “” Apparently each section was amended in 1973 and the conflicting language, again, should be of legislative interest; however, for our immediate task, it is sufficient to say that appellant failed to make an effort “to modify or set aside the demand” as authorized by § 407.070…”
Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region & Sw. Missouri, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Andrew Bailey, Attorney Gen., State of Missouri, Appellant/Cross-Respondent., No. ED112842 (Mo. Ct. App. May 6, 2025). · cites it 12× “3 After receiving the CID, PPGR filed a petition to set aside the CID pursuant to § 407.070. The petition alleges that the parties attempted to resolve their disputes about the CID prior to filing but were unable to reach an agreement.”
The Washington Univ., Respondent, v. Attorney Gen. of the State of Missouri, Appellant., No. ED113034 (Mo. Ct. App. Sept. 16, 2025). · cites it 7× “The Center further alleged because HIPAA 5 Section 407.070 permits a party subject to a CID to file “a petition … to modify or set aside the [CID], stating good cause …” in the circuit court.”
Planned Parenthood Great Plains v. State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney Gen. Andrew Bailey, 713 S.W.3d 213 (Mo. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 5× “Briefing by both parties on appeal combines some of the points identified above, and because some of these points overlap or can be addressed together, we take them up in that same manner, albeit in a different order. Points VI and VII Planned Parenthood’s sixth allegation of…”
State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney Gen. Chris Koster v. Charter Commc'ns, Inc., D/B/A Charter Commc'ns, Charter Fiberlink-Missouri, LLC & Charter Advanced Servs. (MO) LLC, No. WD78258 (Mo. Ct. App. May 26, 2015). · cites it 5× “§ 407.070. In such a petition, the recipient may state its objections to the CID, and why it believes that the CID is unreasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.