Missouri Revised Statutes
Mo. Rev. Stat. § 516.300 (2026)
Actions otherwise limited
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
MO-REVrevisor.mo.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
516.300. Actions otherwise limited. — The provisions of sections 516.010 to 516.370 shall not extend to any action which is or shall be otherwise limited by any statute; but such action shall be brought within the time limited by such statute.
--------
(RSMo 1939 § 1033)
Prior revisions: 1929 § 881; 1919 § 1336; 1909 § 1907
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1958–2025 · leading case: Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Crawford, 833 S.W.2d 868 (Mo. 1992).
Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Crawford, 833 S.W.2d 868 (Mo. 1992). “Both plaintiff and defendants argue that section 516.300, RSMo 1986, prevents the application of section 516.”
Rebecca J. Davison v. Dairy Farmers of Am., Inc., 449 S.W.3d 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014). “370 shall not extend to any action which is or shall be otherwise limited by any statute; but such action shall be brought within the time limited by such statute.” (Emphasis added.”
Natalini v. Little, 185 S.W.3d 239 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006). “4) Section 516.300 and The Application of the Borrowing Statute Plaintiffs contend that the application of the Missouri borrowing statute is precluded by § 516.”
Gramlich v. Travelers Ins. Co., 640 S.W.2d 180 (Mo. Ct. App. 1982). “” Another statute that must be considered with respect to limitation of actions is § 516.300, RSMo 1978, which provides: “The provisions of section 516.”
Boland v. Saint Luke's Health Sys., Inc., 471 S.W.3d 703 (Mo. 2015). “” Section 516.300, however, provides that: “[t]he provisions of sections 516.”
Frazee v. Partney, 314 S.W.2d 915 (Mo. 1958). “At this point we should also note the provisions of § 516.300, as follows: “The provisions of sections 516.”
Kauchick v. Williams, 435 S.W.2d 342 (Mo. 1968). “" Section 516.300 provides: "The provisions of sections 516.”
Yahne v. Pettis Cnty. Sheriff Dep't, 73 S.W.3d 717 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002). “” § 516.300. The limitation period selected by the trial court was, inter alia: 516.”
Haas v. Haas, 504 S.W.2d 44 (Mo. 1973). “It is exclusive of the other Statute of Limitations under Section 516.300, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., and fraud does not toll the running of the time limit prescribed in Section 473.”
Rose v. Arkansas Valley Env't & Util. Auth., 562 F. Supp. 1180 (W.D. Mo. 1983). “190 (the Missouri “borrowing” statute) has any bearing here, since both those sections are ones which, under section 516.300, R.S.Mo.1969 (as amended), are rendered inapplicable with respect to a statutory cause of action which carries its own internal limitations ■provision, as…”
Chouteau Auto Mart, Inc. v. First Bank of Missouri, 148 S.W.3d 17 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004). “120 provides the most applicable limitation period for a UFL claim, as Lauer holds, the principle is still subject to section 516.300, which provides that the provisions of Chapter 516 do not apply if another statute in some other chapter provides a different limitation period.”
Witherspoon v. Gen. Motors Corp., 535 F. Supp. 432 (W.D. Mo. 1982). “370 shall not extend to any action which is or shall be otherwise limited by any statute; but such action shall be brought within the time limited by such statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.