Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-329 (2026)

Intervention; judgment; costs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court shall determine upon the intervention at the same time that the action is decided, and if the claim of the intervenor is not sustained, the intervenor shall pay all costs of the intervention.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1945–2020 · leading case: Carroll v. Gould, 308 Neb. 12 (Neb. 2020).
Carroll v. Gould, 308 Neb. 12 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 6× “” [6,7] We have explained that under this statutory scheme, while intervention under § 25-328 is a matter of right, the court may make a preliminary determination whether the com- plaint in intervention sufficiently alleges the requisite interest.”
Kirchner v. Gast, 100 N.W.2d 65 (Neb. 1959). · cites it 4× “” Section 25-329, R. R. S. 1943, provides: “The court shall determine upon the intervention at the same time that the action is decided, and if the claim of the intervener is not sustained he shall pay all costs of the intervention.”
State ex rel. Nelson v. Butler, 17 N.W.2d 683 (Neb. 1945). · cites it 2× “The interveners shall be taxed With all the costs of their own respective interventions in accordance with section 25-329, R. S. 1943, but all other costs shall be taxed to relators.”
TierOne Bank v. Cup-O-Coa, Inc., 734 N.W.2d 763 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-329 (Cum Supp. 2006) refers to the “claim of the intervenor.”
Tierone Bank v. Cup-o-coa, Inc., 15 Neb. Ct. App. 648 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “" Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-329 (Cum Supp. 2006) refers to the "claim of the intervenor.”
Smith v. Smith (Neb. Ct. App. 2016). “and reinstate the action as previously filed,’” and concluded that the “language seeks substantive alteration of the judgment,” and “qualifies as one to alter or amend the judgment under § 25-329[.]” Weeder, 269 Neb. at 120 , 691 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.