Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 27
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (2026)

Rule 902. Self-authentication; when

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required with respect to the following:

(1) A document bearing a seal purporting to be that of the United States, or of any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession thereof, or the Panama Canal Zone or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or of a political subdivision, department, officer, or agency thereof, and a signature purporting to be an attestation or execution;

(2) A document purporting to bear the signature in his or her official capacity of an officer or employee of any entity included in subdivision (1) of this section, having no seal, if a public officer having a seal and having official duties in the district or political subdivision of the officer or employee certifies under seal that the signer has the official capacity and that the signature is genuine;

(3) A document purporting to be executed or attested in his or her official capacity by a person authorized by the laws of a foreign country to make the execution or attestation, and accompanied by a final certification as to the genuineness of the signature and official position (a) of the executing or attesting person, or (b) of any foreign official whose certificate of genuineness of signature and official position relates to the execution or attestation or is in a chain of certificates of genuineness of signature and official position relating to the execution or attestation. A final certification may be made by a secretary of embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent of the United States, or a diplomatic or consular official of the foreign country assigned or accredited to the United States. If reasonable opportunity has been given to all parties to investigate the authenticity and accuracy of official documents, the judge may, for good cause shown, order that they be treated as presumptively authentic without final certification or permit them to be evidenced by an attested summary with or without final certification;

(4) A copy of an official record or report or entry therein, or of a document authorized by law to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed in a public office, including data compilations in any form, certified as correct by the custodian or other person authorized to make the certification, by certificate complying with subdivision (1), (2), or (3) of this section or complying with any Act of Congress or the Legislature or rule adopted by the Supreme Court of Nebraska which are not in conflict with laws governing such matters;

(5) Books, pamphlets, or other publications purporting to be issued by public authority;

(6) Printed materials purporting to be newspapers or periodicals;

(7) Inscriptions, signs, tags, or labels purporting to have been affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership, control, or origin;

(8) Documents accompanied by a certificate of acknowledgment executed in the manner provided by law by a notary public or other officer authorized by law to take acknowledgments;

(9) Commercial paper, signatures thereon, and documents relating thereto to the extent provided by general commercial law;

(10) Any signature, document, or other matter declared by Act of Congress and the laws of the State of Nebraska to be presumptively or prima facie genuine or authentic;

(11)(a) The original or a copy of a domestic record that meets the requirements of subdivision (6) of section 27-803, as shown by a certification of the custodian or another qualified person.

(b) Before the trial or hearing, the proponent must give an adverse party reasonable written notice of the intent to offer the record and must make the record and certification available for inspection so that the party has a fair opportunity to challenge them on the ground that the sources of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate a lack of trustworthiness;

(12) In a civil case, the original or a copy of a foreign record that meets the requirements of subdivision (11)(a) of this section, modified as follows: The certification must be signed in a manner that, if falsely made, would subject the maker to a criminal penalty in the country where the certification is signed. The proponent must also meet the notice requirements of subdivision (11)(b) of this section;

(13) A record generated by an electronic process or system that produces an accurate result, as shown by a certification of a qualified person that complies with the certification requirements of subdivision (11)(a) or (12) of this section. The proponent must also meet the notice requirements of subdivision (11)(b) of this section; or

(14) Data copied from an electronic device, storage medium, or file, if authenticated by a process of digital identification, as shown by a certification of a qualified person that complies with the certification requirements of subdivision (11)(a) or (12) of this section. The proponent must also meet the notice requirements of subdivision (11)(b) of this section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 28 cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1977–2026 · leading case: State v. Smith, 292 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Smith, 292 Neb. 434 (Neb. 2016). · cites it 4× “902, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 2008). 24 Neb.”
State v. Draganescu, 755 N.W.2d 57 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “[77] Neb.Rev.Stat. § 27-902(7) (Reissue 1995).”
State v. Rice, 335 N.W.2d 269 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 3× “Under this provision a copy of an official record is admissible if it is certified as correct under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 1979), or if a person is called and testifies that after comparing the copy with the original, it is correct and accurate.”
State v. Hall, 708 N.W.2d 209 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “902, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 1995), which provides, in relevant part: Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required with respect to the following: (1) A document bearing a seal purporting to be that of the United States,…”
State v. Jacobson, 728 N.W.2d 613 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “An acknowledgment certified by a notary public may provide sufficient authentication, see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (8) (Reissue 1995), but it is not the only manner in which a document may be authenticated.”
State v. Benzel, 370 N.W.2d 501 (Neb. 1985). · cites it 2× “However, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (4) (Reissue 1979), no extrinsic authentication is required for admissibility of a copy of an official record certified by its authorized custodian who has complied with the rules of the Supreme Court as to certification.”
State v. Trampe, 668 N.W.2d 281 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 4× “The county court found the copy of the certificate to be genuine after comparing the copy with the original, which was made available by the State at trial, and found that it fell within the self-authentication provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 1995), which…”
VKGS v. Planet Bingo, 309 Neb. 950 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “14 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (4) (Reissue 2016) provides that properly certified public records are self-authenticating.”
In re Masek Fam. Trust, 318 Neb. 268 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 2× “Mark and Dianne also submit that the affidavits were self-authenticating under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (8) (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Munn, 322 N.W.2d 429 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 4× “The State successfully introduced, over the objection of the defendant, a copy of a separation *268 agreement and decree of dissolution of marriage entered by the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado.”
State v. Falcon, 319 Neb. 911 (Neb. 2025). · cites it 18× “For self-authentication under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (11) (Cum. Supp.”
In re Interest of Hla H., 25 Neb. Ct. App. 118 (Neb. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 4× “902, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 2016), states that certain documents are self-authenticating and extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibil- ity is not required.”
Show all 28 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902(1) — 5 cases
State v. Munn, 322 N.W.2d 429 (Neb. 1982). “The State successfully introduced, over the objection of the defendant, a copy of a separation *268 agreement and decree of dissolution of marriage entered by the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado.”
State v. Trampe, 668 N.W.2d 281 (Neb. Ct. App. 2003). “The county court found the copy of the certificate to be genuine after comparing the copy with the original, which was made available by the State at trial, and found that it fell within the self-authentication provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (Reissue 1995), which…”
State v. Lightspirit (Neb. Ct. App. 2016).
In re Interest of Aaden S., 329 Neb. 785 (Neb. 2026).
State v. Serr (Neb. Ct. App. 2013).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902(11) — 2 cases
State v. Falcon, 319 Neb. 911 (Neb. 2025). “For self-authentication under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (11) (Cum. Supp.”
State v. Falcon, 33 Neb. Ct. App. 331 (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902(11)(b) — 1 case
State v. Falcon, 319 Neb. 911 (Neb. 2025). “For self-authentication under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902 (11) (Cum. Supp.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902(4) — 3 cases
State v. Falcon, 33 Neb. Ct. App. 331 (Neb. Ct. App. 2025).
State v. Serr (Neb. Ct. App. 2013).
In re Interest of Te'Jon W. (Neb. Ct. App. 2024).
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-902(7) — 2 cases
State v. Draganescu, 755 N.W.2d 57 (Neb. 2008). “[77] Neb.Rev.Stat. § 27-902(7) (Reissue 1995).”
Goldhammer v. Lincoln Anesthesiology Grp. (Neb. Ct. App. 2020).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.