Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1106 (2026)

Recognizance forfeited; when

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When there is a breach of condition of a recognizance, the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1957–2021 · leading case: State v. Hernandez, 511 N.W.2d 535 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hernandez, 511 N.W.2d 535 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1106 (Reissue 1989) states: “When there is a breach of condition of a recognizance, the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail.”
State v. Honey, 86 N.W.2d 187 (Neb. 1957). “It is provided by statute that if there is a breach of condition of a bail bond the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail and when a forfeiture has been made the court shall on motion enter a judgment of default and execution may issue thereon.”
State v. Reed, 133 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 1965). · cites it 2× “On the same date, September 30, 1963, pursuant to the requirements of section 29-1106, R. R. S. 1943, the bail bond was forfeited.”
State v. Konvalin, 86 N.W.2d 361 (Neb. 1957). “The statute makes it the duty of the court, if there is a breach of conditions of a recognizance, to declare a forfeiture of the bail and, on motion, to render judgment.”
State v. Morse, 105 N.W.2d 572 (Neb. 1960). · cites it 3× “§§ 29-1106 and 29-1108, R. R. S. 1943. If the surety on a bail bond fails to deliver his principal into the custody of the proper officer of the law or to procure his attendance in court as the bond requires, the liability of the makers of the bond for the penalty thereof…”
State v. Hammers (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Section 29-1106 provides that “[w]hen there is a breach of condition of a recognizance, the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail.”
Sate v. Oxarart (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1106 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Hart, 252 N.W.2d 139 (Neb. 1977). “The defendant has appealed and contends the judgment is contrary to law.”
State v. Mohammad (Neb. Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 2× “Section 29-1106 clearly states that “[w]hen there is a breach of condition of a recognizance, the court shall declare a forfeiture of the bail.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.