Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 29
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1107 (2026)

Recognizance forfeited; set aside; conditions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The court may direct that a forfeiture of the recognizance be set aside, upon such conditions as the court may impose, if it appears that justice does not require the enforcement of the forfeiture.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1960–2025 · leading case: State v. Hernandez, 511 N.W.2d 535 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Hernandez, 511 N.W.2d 535 (Neb. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 7× “Hernandez filed a motion to set aside the forfeiture of recognizance, based on Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1107 (Reissue 1989).”
State v. Kennedy, 227 N.W.2d 607 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 4× “Cornett, the attorney in fact for Midland, paid the Lancaster County sheriff the expense of returning Kennedy to Lincoln, or $911.21. On June 21, 1974, the trial court overruled Midland’s motion for a new trial; gave Midland credit for the $911.”
State v. Reed, 133 N.W.2d 591 (Neb. 1965). · cites it 3× “On the motions of both parties, hearing was held and evidence adduced on November 26, 1963, on the issue of whether the insurance company was entitled to a remission of all or part of the amount of the bond under the terms of section 29-1107, R. R. S. 1943, which vests…”
State v. Seaton, 103 N.W.2d 833 (Neb. 1960). · cites it 3× “See §§ 29-1107 and 29-1109, R. R. S. 1943. Section 29-1107, R.”
State v. Hammers (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “” Section 29-1107 provides that “[t]he court may direct that a forfeiture of the recognizance be set aside .”
Sate v. Oxarart (Neb. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1107 (Reissue 2016).”
Npimnee v. State (Neb. Ct. App. 2025). “[The judge] denied Plaintiff’s attempt to address the issue of the bond forfeiture in December, 2023.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.