Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179 (2026)

Disciplinary actions; unprofessional conduct, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of section 38-178, unprofessional conduct means any departure from or failure to conform to the standards of acceptable and prevailing practice of a profession or the ethics of the profession, regardless of whether a person, consumer, or entity is injured, or conduct that is likely to deceive or defraud the public or is detrimental to the public interest, including, but not limited to:

(1) Receipt of fees on the assurance that an incurable disease can be permanently cured;

(2) Division of fees, or agreeing to split or divide the fees, received for professional services with any person for bringing or referring a consumer other than (a) with a partner or employee of the applicant or credential holder or his or her office or clinic, (b) with a landlord of the applicant or credential holder pursuant to a written agreement that provides for payment of rent based on gross receipts, or (c) with a former partner or employee of the applicant or credential holder based on a retirement plan or separation agreement;

(3) Obtaining any fee for professional services by fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, including, but not limited to, falsification of third-party claim documents;

(4) Cheating on or attempting to subvert the credentialing examination;

(5) Assisting in the care or treatment of a consumer without the consent of such consumer or his or her legal representative;

(6) Use of any letters, words, or terms, either as a prefix, affix, or suffix, on stationery, in advertisements, or otherwise, indicating that such person is entitled to practice a profession for which he or she is not credentialed;

(7) Performing, procuring, or aiding and abetting in the performance or procurement of a criminal abortion;

(8) Knowingly disclosing confidential information except as otherwise permitted by law;

(9) Commission of any act of sexual abuse, misconduct, or exploitation related to the practice of the profession of the applicant or credential holder;

(10) Failure to keep and maintain adequate records of treatment or service;

(11) Prescribing, administering, distributing, dispensing, giving, or selling any controlled substance or other drug recognized as addictive or dangerous for other than a medically accepted therapeutic purpose;

(12) Prescribing any controlled substance to (a) oneself or (b) except in the case of a medical emergency (i) one's spouse, (ii) one's child, (iii) one's parent, (iv) one's sibling, or (v) any other person living in the same household as the prescriber;

(13) Failure to comply with any federal, state, or municipal law, ordinance, rule, or regulation that pertains to the applicable profession;

(14) Disruptive behavior, whether verbal or physical, which interferes with consumer care or could reasonably be expected to interfere with such care;

(15) Violation of the Preborn Child Protection Act;

(16) Beginning October 1, 2023, performing gender-altering procedures for an individual younger than nineteen years of age in violation of section 71-7304; and

(17) Such other acts as may be defined in rules and regulations.

Nothing in this section shall be construed to exclude determination of additional conduct that is unprofessional by adjudication in individual contested cases.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: Whittle v. State, 309 Neb. 695 (Neb. 2021).
Whittle v. State, 309 Neb. 695 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 15× “§ 38-178 (6)(d) (Reissue 2016), and (2) the practice of the profession outside the acceptable and prevail- ing standard of care (unprofessional conduct), in violation of § 38-178(23), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179 (15) (Reissue 2016), and 172 Neb.”
Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010). · cites it 3× “) The Act also contains a reporting requirement, mandating that every credential holder report to DHHS when he or she has first-hand knowledge of facts giving him or her reason to believe that any person in his or her profession has engaged in unprofessional conduct as defined…”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers, 317 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2024). “59 See § 38-179(15) and (16) (Supp. 2023). 60 Oxnard Beet Sugar Co.”
McDougle v. State ex rel. Bruning, 289 Neb. 19 (Neb. 2014). “2 See § 38-179. 3 172 Neb. Admin. Code, ch. 94, § 016.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers, 317 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2024). “59 See § 38-179(15) and (16) (Supp. 2023). 60 Oxnard Beet Sugar Co.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179(13) — 2 cases
Planned Parenthood of Heartland v. Heineman, 724 F. Supp. 2d 1025 (D. Neb. 2010). “) The Act also contains a reporting requirement, mandating that every credential holder report to DHHS when he or she has first-hand knowledge of facts giving him or her reason to believe that any person in his or her profession has engaged in unprofessional conduct as defined…”
Whittle v. State, 309 Neb. 695 (Neb. 2021). “§ 38-178 (6)(d) (Reissue 2016), and (2) the practice of the profession outside the acceptable and prevail- ing standard of care (unprofessional conduct), in violation of § 38-178(23), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179 (15) (Reissue 2016), and 172 Neb.”
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179(15) — 3 cases
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers, 317 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2024). “59 See § 38-179(15) and (16) (Supp. 2023). 60 Oxnard Beet Sugar Co.”
Whittle v. State, 309 Neb. 695 (Neb. 2021). “§ 38-178 (6)(d) (Reissue 2016), and (2) the practice of the profession outside the acceptable and prevail- ing standard of care (unprofessional conduct), in violation of § 38-178(23), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 38-179 (15) (Reissue 2016), and 172 Neb.”
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Hilgers, 317 Neb. 217 (Neb. 2024). “59 See § 38-179(15) and (16) (Supp. 2023). 60 Oxnard Beet Sugar Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.