Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 43
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2920 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 43-2920 to 43-2943 shall be known and may be cited as the Parenting Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35 cases (17 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Becher v. Becher, 908 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Becher v. Becher, 908 N.W.2d 12 (Neb. 2018). · cites it 2× “9 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State v. Jeffery T., 932 N.W.2d 692 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Dooling v. Dooling, 930 N.W.2d 481 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016).”
State v. Hugo C., 924 N.W.2d 743 (Neb. Ct. App. 2019). · cites it 2× “(17) Parenting functions mean those aspects of the relationship in which a parent or person in the parenting role makes fundamental decisions and performs fundamental functions necessary for the care and development of a child.”
Lasu v. Lasu, 944 N.W.2d 773 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “(d) Did District Court Abuse Its Discretion? Emmanuel argues that the district court did not determine child custody based on Jacob’s best interests, apparently because he disagrees that an analysis of the relevant factors supports the custody ruling solely in Naomi’s favor.”
Weaver v. Weaver, 954 N.W.2d 619 (Neb. 2021). · cites it 2× “Because the district court found it would be in the child’s best interests to have more time with Glen, the Court of Appeals reversed the order denying modification and remanded the cause with directions for the district court to consider the relief sought in accordance with the…”
Donald v. Donald, 892 N.W.2d 100 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “6 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016).”
Mann v. Mann, 7 N.W.3d 845 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “2022). 2 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-1226 to 43-1266 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Hernandez v. Dorantes, 994 N.W.2d 46 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “In light of the above statutory requirements, we have emphasized that whether parents have mediated or otherwise agreed on a parenting plan, or whether the issues of custody and parenting time are disputed, “the court is required to independently determine that any parenting…”
Noland v. Yost, 998 N.W.2d 57 (Neb. 2023). · cites it 2× “2d 134, 140 (2021) (noting Parenting Act “offers guidance as to the obligations that the Legislature has deemed important to the parental relationship”). 35 § 43-2922(17) (emphasis supplied).”
Tyler F. v. Sara P., 945 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 2020). · cites it 2× “2019). - 411 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports TYLER F.”
Vyhlidal v. Vyhlidal, 973 N.W.2d 171 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “Evidentiary Hearing After spreading our mandate, the district court set the matter for a hearing. It ordered Nessa to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of court for willful violation of the decree.”
Show all 35 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.