Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-2920 (2026)
Act, how cited
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 43-2920 to 43-2943 shall be known and may be cited as the Parenting Act.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (17 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Becher v. Becher, 299 Neb. 206 (Neb. 2018).
Becher v. Becher, 299 Neb. 206 (Neb. 2018). “9 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Supp.”
State on behalf of Kaaden S. v. Jeffery T., 303 Neb. 933 (Neb. 2019). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Dooling v. Dooling, 303 Neb. 494 (Neb. 2019). “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016).”
Lasu v. Lasu, 28 Neb. Ct. App. 478 (Neb. Ct. App. 2020). “(c) Applicable Law Under the Parenting Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Weaver v. Weaver, 308 Neb. 373 (Neb. 2021). “Walters 4 for the proposition that we will generally enforce valid stipu- lations in dissolution decrees, including an agreement that physical custody may be modified without showing a material change in circumstances, as long as the modification comports with a child’s best…”
Donald v. Donald, 296 Neb. 123 (Neb. 2017). “6 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016).”
Mann v. Mann, 316 Neb. 910 (Neb. 2024). “1 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Hernandez v. Dorantes, 994 N.W.2d 46 (Neb. 2023). “905 In any proceeding in which parenting functions for a child are at issue under Chapter 42, a parenting plan shall be developed and shall be approved by the court.”
Noland v. Yost, 998 N.W.2d 57 (Neb. 2023). “33 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016 & Cum.”
Tyler F. v. Sara P., 306 Neb. 397 (Neb. 2020). “) The language of § 43-2932 considers the existence of only two parents in the requirements under subsection (1)(a)(iv) that a court develop 20 See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 43-2920 to 43-2943 (Reissue 2016, Cum.”
Vyhlidal v. Vyhlidal, 973 N.W.2d 171 (Neb. 2022). “is a mat- ter to be considered at an evidentiary hearing where Eric can offer evidence to demonstrate both that a violation of the court order occurred and that the violation was willful.”
Sulzle v. Sulzle, 318 Neb. 194 (Neb. 2024). “4 If a parenting plan “lacks any of the elements required by the act,” 5 the court shall either modify and approve the parenting plan as modified, reject the parenting plan and order the parties to develop a new parenting plan, or reject the parenting plan and create a parenting…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.