Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 53
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 53-101 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 53-101 to 53-1,122 shall be known and may be cited as the Nebraska Liquor Control Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases, 1934–2019 · leading case: DLH, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 665 N.W.2d 629 (Neb. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DLH, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 665 N.W.2d 629 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 8× “In order for a regulation to be "necessary or convenient" to the enforcement of the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, the Commission must show some nexus between the regulation and alcoholic liquors.”
Abay, L. L.C. v. Neb. Liquor Control Comm'n, 927 N.W.2d 780 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 3× “The district court examined these conditions and determined that these restrictions on the liquor license were within the Commission's authority under the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 53-101 to 53-1,122 (Reissue 2010, Cum.”
McManus Enters. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm., 303 Neb. 56 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “56 are necessary or convenient to the enforcement of the intent, purpose, and requirements of the act.12 McManus does not dis- pute that as a licensee, it is subject to the rules and regulations of the act, including the disturbance rule.”
Mcmanus Enters., Inc. v. Neb. Liquor Control Comm'n, 926 N.W.2d 660 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 53-101 to 53-1,122 (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
Orchard Hill Neighborhood Ass'n v. Orchard Hill Mercantile, L.L.C., 738 N.W.2d 820 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “Because competent evidence — including properly admitted expert testimony — supports the court’s decision, we affirm. The remaining issues are unnecessary to resolve this case, and we need not address them on appeal.”
Kozal v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm., 297 Neb. 938 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 2× “3 Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 53-101 to 53-1,122 (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
City of Omaha v. Kum & Go, L.L.C., 642 N.W.2d 154 (Neb. 2002). · cites it 2× “The district court, however, determined that the Commission’s definition of “church,” set forth in § 012.”
Schwarting v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 711 N.W.2d 556 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 2× “See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 53-101 et seq. (Reissue 2004 & Supp.”
Harrington v. Strong, 363 F. Supp. 3d 984 (D. Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “1120, which amended the Nebraska Liquor Control Act (NLCA), Neb. Rev. Stat. § 53-101 to § 53-1,122, and included new licensure requirements and regulations for "bottle clubs.”
Gas'N Shop, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 427 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “In each of the six orders, dated March 14, 1986, the commission again found that Gas ’N Shop was fit, willing, and able to provide the proposed services; that it could conform to all provisions, requirements, rules, and regulations found in the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, Neb.…”
Bosselman, Inc. v. State, 432 N.W.2d 226 (Neb. 1988). · cites it 2× “1986), which undertakes a number of substantive and procedural changes in the regulation and control of the retail sale of alcoholic liquors *472 under the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 53-101 etseq. (Reissue 1984&Supp.”
Kwik Shop, Inc. v. City of Lincoln, 498 N.W.2d 102 (Neb. 1993). · cites it 2× “Acting in accordance with the recommendation of the appellees, the City of Lincoln, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, the Lincoln Package Beverage Association, the Culler Neighborhood Association, and Joe Quattrocchi, and pursuant to the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, Neb. Rev. Stat.…”
Show all 27 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.