Nebraska Revised Statutes
Neb. Rev. Stat. § 53-116 (2026)
Power to regulate and control alcoholic liquor
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
The power to regulate all phases of the control of the manufacture, distribution, sale, and traffic of alcoholic liquor, except as specifically delegated in the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, is vested exclusively in the commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1946–2019 · leading case: Abay, L. L.C. v. Neb. Liquor Control Comm'n, 927 N.W.2d 780 (Neb. 2019).
Abay, L. L.C. v. Neb. Liquor Control Comm'n, 927 N.W.2d 780 (Neb. 2019). “Section 53-116 provides: "The power to regulate all phases of the control of the manufacture, distribution, sale, and traffic of alcoholic liquor, except as specifically delegated in the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, is vested exclusively in the [C]ommission.”
Cnty. Cork, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 550 N.W.2d 913 (Neb. 1996). “Furthermore, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 53-116 was also amended by L.”
Terry Carpenter, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 120 N.W.2d 374 (Neb. 1963). “1943, and possessed of the general powers described in sections 53-116 and 53-119, R. R. S. 1943, which was admitted to be true at the time the plaintiff’s petition was filed on November 28, 1960.”
Gas'N Shop, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 427 N.W.2d 784 (Neb. 1988). “§ 53-116 (Reissue 1984). Section 53-147 (Reissue 1984) authorizes the governing bodies of cities and villages to regulate by ordinance the business of all retail or bottle club licensees carried on within their corporate limits provided that any ordinance not be inconsistent…”
72nd Street Pizza, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 261 N.W.2d 614 (Neb. 1978). “Condensed to its essence, the question is whether the action of the Commission becomes arbitrary and unreasonable because the commission relied upon the city council's recommendation for denial, which, if one accepts the applicant's and the District Court's interpretation of the…”
Phelps, Inc. v. City of Hastings, 42 N.W.2d 300 (Neb. 1950). “" Section 53-116, R.S. 1943. It becomes apparent that the Liquor Control Commission has full power to regulate the liquor traffic except as such power is specifically delegated elsewhere.”
City of Omaha v. C.A. Howell, Inc., 832 N.W.2d 30 (Neb. Ct. App. 2013). “” Section 53-117 also provides, in part, that the Commission has the power to receive, issue, suspend, cancel, and revoke liquor licenses; promulgate rules and regulations; govern the traffic of alcoholic liquor and “enforce strictly” the Nebraska Liquor Control Act; inspect…”
Bali Hai', Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 236 N.W.2d 614 (Neb. 1975). “The appellant argues the broad sweep of the language of section 53-116, R. R. S. 1943, which provides: “The power to regulate all phases of the control of the manufacture, distribution, sale, and traffic in alcoholic liquors, except as specifically delegated in this act, is…”
Abay, L.L.C. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm., 303 Neb. 214 (Neb. 2019). “Section 53-116 provides: “The power to regulate all phases of the control of the manufacture, distribution, sale, and traf- fic of alcoholic liquor, except as specifically delegated in the Nebraska Liquor Control Act, is vested exclusively in the [C]ommission.”
J K & J, Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Comm'n, 231 N.W.2d 694 (Neb. 1975). “Insofar as the record in this case is concerned as it relates to the applicant’s entitlement to a license, it is absent any evidence justifying the denial.”
T & Np Co., Inc. v. Nebraska Liquor Control Com'n, 204 N.W.2d 809 (Neb. 1973). “There was other evidence, but the foregoing is a summary of the evidence material to the consideration of.”
State ex rel. Johnson v. Chase, 25 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 1946). “” Section 53-116, R. S. 1943, provides: “The power to regulate all phases of the control of the manufacture, distribution, sale, and traffic in alcoholic liquors, except as specifically delegated in this act, is hereby vested exclusively in the commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.