Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 59
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1602 (2026)

Unfair competition; practices; unlawful

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce shall be unlawful.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 47 cases (16 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 12× “"Any person who is injured in his business or property by a violation of sections 59-1602 to 59-1606... may bring a civil action in the district court to enjoin further violations, to recover the actual damages sustained by him, or both, together with the costs of the suit .”
Salem Grain Co. v. Consol. Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 9× “Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1602 (Reissue 2010) mir- rors the language of 15 U.”
Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co., 605 N.W.2d 136 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 7× “Eventually, he filed this action against appellants for fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, and violation of the CPA, specifically, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1602 (Reissue 1998).”
Jenkins v. Gen. Collection Co., 538 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D. Neb. 2008). · cites it 3× “” Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1602 (Reissue 2004). DISCUSSION Collateral Estoppel and Res Judicata The Defendants assert that the doctrines of “collateral attack” and res judica-ta bar Howard and Logue from re-litigating the issues of whether GCC’s collection actions against them were…”
Raad v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 13 F. Supp. 2d 1003 (D. Neb. 1998). · cites it 8× “CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Since it is undisputed that Nebraska law applies in this diversity case, the ultimate legal issue is whether Wal-Mart’s conduct amounted to an “unfair or deceptive act[ ] or practiee[ ] in the conduct of’ its business in violation of Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1602…”
State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. Consum.'s Choice Foods, Inc., 755 N.W.2d 583 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR Jayco claims the district court erred in finding that it violated §§ 59-1602 and 87-302(a)(5) and in awarding excessive damages, injunctive relief, civil penalties, costs, and attorney fees.”
Hage v. Gen. Serv. Bureau, 306 F. Supp. 2d 883 (D. Neb. 2003). · cites it 4× “§ 1692 et sec/, and the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act (NCPA), Neb. Rev Stat. § 59-1602 and Neb.Rev. Stat.”
White v. Medico Life Ins., 327 N.W.2d 606 (Neb. 1982). · cites it 3× “Section 59-1602 declares unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any trade or commerce to be unlawful.”
Beyers v. Richmond, 937 A.2d 1082 (Pa. 2007). · cites it 2× “30-14-103; Neb. Rev.Stat. § 59-1602; Nev.Rev.Stat. Ann.”
In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 336 F. Supp. 3d 395 (D.N.J. 2018). “Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann §§ 59-1602 ; -1609. In order to state a valid claim under the Act, "the unfair or deceptive act or practice must have an impact upon the public interest.”
In re Conagra Foods Inc., 908 F. Supp. 2d 1090 (C.D. Cal. 2012). · cites it 2× “; (2) the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1602, et seq.; and (3) the Nebraska Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Neb.”
Reinbrecht v. Walgreen Co., 742 N.W.2d 243 (Neb. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3× “" (Emphasis supplied.) The quoted language is followed by a definition of "deceptive" and is preceded by a definition of "unfair.”
Show all 47 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.