Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 59
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 (2026)

Terms, defined

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

For purposes of the Consumer Protection Act, unless the context otherwise requires:

(1) Person shall mean natural persons, corporations, trusts, unincorporated associations, partnerships, and limited liability companies;

(2) Trade and commerce shall mean the sale of assets or services and any commerce directly or indirectly affecting the people of the State of Nebraska; and

(3) Assets shall mean any property, tangible or intangible, real, personal, or mixed, and wherever situated, and any other thing of value.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 74 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1980–2025 · leading case: Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004). · cites it 24× “The plaintiffs brought the action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging a violation of Nebraska's Consumer Protection Act (Act), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998 & Cum.”
State ex rel. Peterson v. Creative Comm. Promotions, 302 Neb. 606 (Neb. 2019). · cites it 2× “Based on these allegations, the State asserted claims under Nebraska's Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter CPA), see Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 2010 & Cum.”
Salem Grain Co. v. Consol. Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 (Neb. 2017). · cites it 4× “At the time of the alleged actions, the other appellees were involved with various organizations in Falls City: Becky Cromer was the executive director of the Falls City Economic Development and Growth Enterprise (EDGE), a private orga- nization; Gary Jorn, Ray Joy, and Bart…”
Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co., 605 N.W.2d 136 (Neb. 2000). · cites it 6× “The CPA is found at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998).”
Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Inv. Corp., 702 N.W.2d 792 (Neb. 2005). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs’ action was based on multiple theories of recovery including fraud, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Consumer Protection Act (hereinafter CPA), Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 59-1601 to 59-1622 (Reissue 1998 & Cum.”
In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig., 252 F.R.D. 83 (D. Mass. 2008). · cites it 4× “), *99 Nebraska (Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1601, et seq.), New Jersey ( N.”
McCaul v. Am. Sav. Co., 331 N.W.2d 795 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 5× “(Reissue 1977), and was also exempt from the Consumer Protection Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1978).”
Travelers Indem. Co. v. Int'l Nutrition, Inc., 734 N.W.2d 719 (Neb. 2007). · cites it 2× “4 Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 2004).”
Jenkins v. Gen. Collection Co., 538 F. Supp. 2d 1165 (D. Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “(“FDCPA”), and the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act, Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (“NCPA”).”
State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. Consum.'s Choice Foods, Inc., 755 N.W.2d 583 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “2006), and the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), see Neb. Rev.Stat. §§ 59-1601 through 59-1622 (Reissue 2004 & Cum.”
Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Invest. Corp., 748 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2008). “§ 59-1601(2) (Reissue 2004). [23] Nelson v.”
Lynch v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 745 N.W.2d 291 (Neb. 2008). · cites it 2× “(Reissue 1999); fraud; unjust enrichment; and violation of Nebraska's Consumer Protection Act, Neb. Rev.Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998).”
Show all 74 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601(2) — 6 cases
Arthur v. Microsoft Corp., 676 N.W.2d 29 (Neb. 2004). “The plaintiffs brought the action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging a violation of Nebraska's Consumer Protection Act (Act), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998 & Cum.”
Nelson v. Lusterstone Surfacing Co., 605 N.W.2d 136 (Neb. 2000). “The CPA is found at Neb. Rev. Stat. § 59-1601 et seq. (Reissue 1998).”
Eicher v. Mid Am. Fin. Invest. Corp., 748 N.W.2d 1 (Neb. 2008). “§ 59-1601(2) (Reissue 2004). [23] Nelson v.”
Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Mylan Labs., Inc., 205 F.R.D. 369 (D.D.C. 2002).
Tracker Marine, L.P. v. Ogle, 108 S.W.3d 349 (Tex. App. 2003).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.