Neb. Rev. Stat. » Chapter 75
Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-604 (2026)

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

75-604.

Transferred to section 86-128.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17 cases, 1965–2003 · leading case: Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 590 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Nebraska Pub. Power Dist., 590 N.W.2d 840 (Neb. 1999). · cites it 7× “The Nebraska Telephone Association asked that the PSC address whether the NPPD was eligible to receive a certificate of public convenience and necessity, considering Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-604 and 70-625 (Reissue 1996) and the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.”
ATS Mobile Tel., Inc. v. Gen. Commc'ns Co., 282 N.W.2d 16 (Neb. 1979). · cites it 6× “, Omaha, Nebraska, (GCC), from an order of the Nebraska Public Service Commission (PSC), entered January 16, 1978, directing GCC to cease and desist from operation as a radio common carrier in Nebraska intrastate commerce until such time as GCC had satisfied and fulfilled the…”
Lincoln Elec. Sys. v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 655 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2003). · cites it 4× “Certain sections of this bill, originally codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-604 (5) and 86-2302(2) (Supp.”
Radio-Fone, Inc. v. A.T.S. Mobile Tel., Inc., 193 N.W.2d 442 (Neb. 1972). · cites it 6× “The statute provides: “No person, firm, partnership, corporation, cooperative, or association shall offer telephone service or shall construct a new telephone line in or extend an existing telephone line into the territory of another telephone company without first making an…”
Sherdon v. Dann, 229 N.W.2d 531 (Neb. 1975). · cites it 8× “The complaint alleged that the defendants were offering telephone service to the public for hire without having obtained a certificate of public convenience and necessity therefor, in violation of section 75-604, R.R. S.1943. The Nebraska Public Service Commission found that the…”
Hartman v. Glenwood Tel. Membership Corp., 249 N.W.2d 468 (Neb. 1977). · cites it 2× “Radio-Fone involved section 75-604, R. R. S. 1943, not section 75-613, R.”
ATS Mobile Tel., Inc. v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 330 N.W.2d 123 (Neb. 1983). · cites it 3× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-604 (Reissue 1981). The Commission did consider these matters.”
Sherdon v. Am. Commc'n Co., 134 N.W.2d 42 (Neb. 1965). · cites it 8× “Section 75-604, R. S. Supp., 1963, originally section 86-213, R.”
Nw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Pleasant Valley Tel. Co., 150 N.W.2d 922 (Neb. 1967). · cites it 12× “The Northwestern Bell Telephone Company filed its application with the Nebraska State Railway Commission *800 pursuant to section 75-604, R. S. Supp., 1965, for a certificate of convenience and necessity to construct and extend telephone lines and cables into a portion of the…”
Cox Cable Commc'ns, Inc. v. Simpson, 569 F. Supp. 507 (D. Neb. 1983). · cites it 4× “In its order, the NPSC observed that Neb.Rev.Stat. § 75-604 (Reissue 1981) 6 “requires the issuance *514 of a certificate of public convenience and necessity before offering telephone service in the territory of another telephone company.”
In Re Mcleod Telemanagement, Inc., 583 N.W.2d 39 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 3× “" The Legislature has empowered the PSC to regulate the entry of telecommunications carriers into the Nebraska marketplace through Neb.Rev. Stat § 75-604 (Reissue 1996) and § 86-805.”
Nw. Bell Tel. Co. v. Consol. Tel. Co., 142 N.W.2d 324 (Neb. 1966). · cites it 6× “Section 75-604, R. S. Supp., 1963, provides in part: “No person, firm, partnership, corporation, cooperative, or association shall offer telephone service or shall construct a new telephone line in or extend an existing telephone line into the territory of another telephone…”
Show all 17 citing cases →
— Neb. Rev. Stat. § 75-604(5) — 1 case
Lincoln Elec. Sys. v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 655 N.W.2d 363 (Neb. 2003). “Certain sections of this bill, originally codified at Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 75-604 (5) and 86-2302(2) (Supp.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.