Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1916 (2026)

Foreclosure proceedings; surplus proceeds; disposition; prorating

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If a surplus remains after satisfying all costs and taxes against any particular item of real property, the excess shall be applied in the manner provided by law for the disposition of the surplus in the foreclosure of mortgages on real property. If the proceeds are insufficient to pay the costs and all the taxes, when the plaintiff is a governmental subdivision other than a land bank or is a municipal corporation or a drainage or irrigation district, the amount remaining shall be prorated among the governmental subdivisions, municipal corporations, and drainage or irrigation districts in the proportion of their interest in the decree of foreclosure. The proceeds of the sale of one item of real property shall not be applied to the discharge of a lien for taxes against another item of real property except when so directed by the decree for foreclosure under the circumstances set forth in section 77-1910. The lien on real estate for special assessments levied by any community improvement district or sanitary and improvement district shall not be entitled to any surplus unless such special assessments have been previously offered for sale by the county treasurer.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2024 · leading case: Cont'l Resources v. Fair, 317 Neb. 391 (Neb. 2024).
Cont'l Resources v. Fair, 317 Neb. 391 (Neb. 2024). · cites it 2× “” Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1916 (Cum. Supp. 2014).”
Cont'l Resources v. Fair, 311 Neb. 184 (Neb. 2022). · cites it 2× “See, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 77-1916 (Reissue 2018); County of Lancaster v.”
Ina Grp., LLC v. Young, 716 N.W.2d 733 (Neb. 2006). · cites it 4× “See § 77-1916. The issue presented here is what happens if the proceeds are insufficient, but the plaintiff is not a governmental subdivision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.