Nebraska Revised Statutes

Neb. Rev. Stat. § 86-801 (2026)

Act, how cited

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NE-LEGnebraskalegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 86-801 to 86-807 shall be known and may be cited as the Kelsey Smith Act.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1989–1998 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Spire v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 445 N.W.2d 284 (Neb. 1989).
State Ex Rel. Spire v. Nw. Bell Tel. Co., 445 N.W.2d 284 (Neb. 1989). · cites it 14× “835 (the act), now codified as Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 86-801 et seq. (Reissue 1987), declared unconstitutional on a number of grounds.”
State Ex Rel. Spire v. Beermann, 455 N.W.2d 749 (Neb. 1990). · cites it 4× “835 (now codified as Neb.Rev.Stat. §§ 86-801 et seq. (Reissue 1987)), was found to be constitutional, however, because the act was "specific legislation," under Neb.”
In Re Mcleod Telemanagement, Inc., 583 N.W.2d 39 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 11× “The policy specifically calls for (1) the preservation of affordable rates, (2) the maintenance and advancement of the efficiency and availability of telecommunications services, (3) the payment of reasonable charges for telecommunications services, and (4) the promotion of…”
McLeod Telemanagement, Inc. v. U S West Commc'ns, Inc., 583 N.W.2d 39 (Neb. 1998). · cites it 11× “for (1) the preservation of affordable rates, (2) the maintenance and advancement of the efficiency and availability of telecommunications services, (3) the payment of reasonable charges for telecommunications services, and (4) the promotion of diversity in the supply of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.