Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 125C - CUSTODY AND VISITATION
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 125C.250 (2026)

Attorney’s fees and costs

✓ laws through the 2025 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 125C.250  Attorney’s fees and costs.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 125C.0689, in an action to determine legal custody, physical custody or visitation with respect to a child, the court may order reasonable fees of counsel and experts and other costs of the proceeding to be paid in proportions and at times determined by the court.

      (Added to NRS by 2013, 2956)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 2014–2023 · leading case: Roe v. Roe, 535 P.3d 274 (Nev. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Roe v. Roe, 535 P.3d 274 (Nev. 2023). · cites it 8× “NRS 125C.250 allows for the recovery of reasonable attorney fees in child custody actions.”
Matkulak v. Davis, 516 P.3d 667 (Nev. 2022). · cites it 2× “Attorney fees NRS 125C.250 gives the district court broad discretion in a child custody action to order reasonable attorney fees and costs as SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 7 (0) I947A • determined by the court.”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow C/W 82245, No. 81978 (Nev. May 12, 2022). · cites it 2× “See NRS 125C.250 (authorizing an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party in a child custody matter).”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow (Child Custody), No. 83726 (Nev. May 12, 2022). · cites it 2× “See NRS 125C.250 (authorizing an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party in a child custody matter).”
Shahrokhi v. Burrow C/W 82245, No. 81978 (Nev. May 12, 2022). “See NRS 125C.250 (authorizing an award of attorney fees to the prevailing party in a child custody matter).”
Stinziano v. Walley (Child Custody), No. 63113 (Nev. Nov. 14, 2014). “Douglas Cherry 1 We note that NRS 125C.250 allows the district court to award attorney fees in a child custody action, but was not effective until after this case was decided.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.