Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 159.0593 (2026)

Determination of whether proposed protected person is prohibited from possessing firearm under federal law

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 159.0593  Determination of whether proposed protected person is prohibited from possessing firearm under federal law.

      1.  If the court orders a general guardian appointed for a proposed protected person, the court shall determine, by clear and convincing evidence, whether the proposed protected person is a person with a mental defect who is prohibited from possessing a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(4) or (g)(4). If a court makes a finding pursuant to this section that the proposed protected person is a person with a mental defect, the court shall include the finding in the order appointing the guardian and cause, within 5 business days after issuing the order, a record of the order to be transmitted to the Central Repository for Nevada Records of Criminal History, along with a statement indicating that the record is being transmitted for inclusion in each appropriate database of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.

      2.  As used in this section:

      (a) “National Instant Criminal Background Check System” has the meaning ascribed to it in NRS 179A.062.

      (b) “Person with a mental defect” means a person who, as a result of marked subnormal intelligence, mental illness, incapacitation, condition or disease:

             (1) Is a danger to himself or herself or others; or

             (2) Lacks the capacity to contract or manage his or her own affairs.

      (Added to NRS by 2009, 2490; A 2015, 1805; 2017, 3905)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2019–2019 · leading case: Hager v. State, 447 P.3d 1063 (Nev. 2019).
Hager v. State, 447 P.3d 1063 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 3× “On "receiving a record transmitted pursuant to NRS 159.0593, 174.035, 175.533, 175.539, 178.”
Hager (ian) Vs. State, 2019 NV 34 (Nev. 2019). · cites it 6× “On "receiving a record transmitted pursuant to NRS 159.0593, 174.035, 175.533, 175.539, 178.”
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 159.0593(1): 2 cases
Hager v. State, 447 P.3d 1063 (Nev. 2019). “On "receiving a record transmitted pursuant to NRS 159.0593, 174.035, 175.533, 175.539, 178.”
Hager (ian) Vs. State, 2019 NV 34 (Nev. 2019). “On "receiving a record transmitted pursuant to NRS 159.0593, 174.035, 175.533, 175.539, 178.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.