Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 172 - PROCEEDINGS AFTER COMMITMENT AND BEFORE INDICTMENT

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 172.275

Discharge of grand jury; discharge or excuse of juror

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 172.275  Discharge of grand jury; discharge or excuse of juror.

      1.  A grand jury shall serve until discharged by the court and may be so discharged at any time after the expiration of 1 year. At any time for cause shown the court may excuse a juror either temporarily or permanently, and in the latter event the court may impanel an alternate grand juror in place of the juror excused.

      2.  Where the court is composed of more than one judge, any judge may discharge or excuse a juror; but if any other judge notifies the judge so acting, in writing within 24 hours after the action is taken, that the judge objects, the action stands rescinded and is not effective unless the concurrence of a majority of the judges composing the court is obtained.

      (Added to NRS by 1967, 1411; A 1985, 557)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1979–2013 · leading case: Hill v. State
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hill v. State (2008) nev “” In addition, NRS 172.275 governs when a grand juror is to be excused, providing that “[a]t any time for cause shown the court may excuse a juror either temporarily or permanently, and in the latter event the court may impanel an alternate grand juror in place of the juror…”
In Re the Report of the Washoe County Grand Jury (1979) nev · cites it 2× “145), or a juror excused (NRS 172.275). Accordingly, we hold the district court has the limited power to review reports of grand juries within its jurisdiction prior to publication.”
Rugamas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark (2013) nev “145), or a juror excused (NRS 172.275),” and “has the limited power to review reports of grand juries within its jurisdiction prior to publication”).”
Lane v. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County (1988) nev “145), or a juror excused (NRS 172.275). In re Report Washoe Co. Grand Jury, 95 Nev.”
Lane v. SECOND JUD. DIST., WASHOE COUNTY (1988) nev “145), or a juror excused (NRS 172.275). In re Report Washoe Co. Grand Jury, 95 Nev.”
Rugamas v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct. (2013) nev “145), or a juror excused (NRS 172.275)," and "has the limited power to review reports of grand juries within its jurisdiction prior to publication").”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.