Nev. Rev. Stat. » NRS: CHAPTER 207 - MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES
Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 207.350 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 207.350  Definitions.  As used in NRS 207.350 to 207.520, inclusive, unless the context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 207.360 to 207.390, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those sections.

      (Added to NRS by 1983, 1495)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1988–2013 · leading case: Allum v. Valley Bank of Nevada, 849 P.2d 297 (Nev. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allum v. Valley Bank of Nevada, 849 P.2d 297 (Nev. 1993). “2 Nevada’s racketeering statutes, found at NRS 207.350 through NRS 207.520, are patterned after the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or “RICO,” statutes, 18 U.”
State Ex Rel. Goddard v. Gravano, 108 P.3d 251 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). “§§ 97-43-1 to -9 (2003)(same); Nev.Rev.Stat. §§ 207.350 to .520 (2002)(same); NJ.”
Hale v. Burkhardt, 764 P.2d 866 (Nev. 1988). “Nevada’s Civil RICO Statute Nevada’s anti-racketeering statutes, NRS 207.350 through NRS 207.520, inclusive, were enacted in 1983 2 and are patterned after the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations, or “RICO,” statutes, 18 U.”
Cummings v. Charter Hosp. of Las Vegas, Inc., 896 P.2d 1137 (Nev. 1995). “Nevada’s anti-racketeering laws are codified at NRS 207.350 through NRS 207.520. Under NRS 207.”
In Re Stratosphere Corp. Sec. Litig., 66 F. Supp. 2d 1182 (D. Nev. 1999). · cites it 2× “Since liability under the federal law is still an open question, this Court will also deny Defendants request to dismiss Plaintiffs claim under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 207.350 (1997) (Nevada state equivalent of federal RICO) since it is still a triable issue whether Defendants may have…”
Davenport v. Gmac Mortg. (Nev. 2013). “9 Civil racketeering Davenport's civil racketeering claim was predicated on GMAC's alleged violation of Nevada's RICO statutes, NRS 207.350 through NRS 207.520. To state a claim for such a violation, a plaintiff must allege, with specificity, that the defendant "engag[ed] in at…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.