Nevada Revised Statutes
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 288.050 (2026)
“Local government employee” defined
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 288.050 “Local government employee” defined. “Local
government employee” means any person employed by a local government employer.
(Added to NRS by 1969, 1376)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2005–2018 · leading case: City of North Las Vegas v. State, Local Gov't Emp.-Mgmt. Relations Bd., 261 P.3d 1071 (Nev. 2011).
City of North Las Vegas v. State, Local Gov't Emp.-Mgmt. Relations Bd., 261 P.3d 1071 (Nev. 2011). “Specifically, the EMRB found, among other things, that: (1) Spannbauer was a local government employee as defined in NRS 288.050, (2) there was no verification of whether caselaw existed supporting the City and the Department treating Spannbauer as a probationary employee, (3)…”
UMC Physicians' Bargaining Unit of Nevada Serv. Employees Union v. Nevada Serv. Employees Union/SEIU Local 1107, 178 P.3d 709 (Nev. 2008). “A local government employee as defined in NRS 288.050. We have held that it is appropriate to look to the decisions of the National Labor Relations Board when interpreting NRS Chapter 288.”
Weiner v. Beatty, 116 P.3d 829 (Nev. 2005). “060 (defining “local government employer” as “any political subdivision of this State or any public or quasi-public corporation organized under the laws of this State and includes, without limitation, .”
Umc Phys. Bar. Unit of Nv. v. Nv. Ser. Emp., 178 P.3d 709 (Nev. 2008). “030 reads, in its entirety: "Complainant" or "petitioner" means: 1. A local government employer as defined in NRS 288.”
Clark Cnty. Deputy Marshals Ass'n. v. Clark Cnty. (Nev. 2018). “" NRS 288.050. By the terms of the Chapter, once it is determined that the parties in question are not local government employees, as happened here, there is no need for further analysis as to which subjects require bargaining.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.