NRS
463.151 Regulations requiring exclusion or ejection of certain persons
from licensed establishments: Persons included.
1. The Legislature hereby declares that
the exclusion or ejection of certain persons from licensed gaming
establishments which conduct pari-mutuel wagering or operate any race book,
sports pool or games, other than slot machines only, is necessary to effectuate
the policies of this chapter and to maintain effectively the strict regulation
of licensed gaming.
2. The Commission may by regulation
provide for the establishment of a list of persons who are to be excluded or
ejected from any licensed gaming establishment which conducts pari-mutuel
wagering or operates any race book, sports pool or games, other than slot
machines only. The list may include any person whose presence in the
establishment is determined by the Board and the Commission to pose a threat to
the interests of this state or to licensed gaming, or both.
3. In making that determination, the Board
and the Commission may consider any:
(a) Prior conviction of a crime which is a felony
in this state or under the laws of the United States, a crime involving moral
turpitude or a violation of the gaming laws of any state;
(b) Violation or conspiracy to violate the
provisions of this chapter relating to:
(1) The failure to disclose an interest in
a gaming establishment for which the person must obtain a license; or
(2) Willful evasion of fees or taxes;
(c) Notorious or unsavory reputation which would
adversely affect public confidence and trust that the gaming industry is free
from criminal or corruptive elements; or
(d) Written order of a governmental agency which
authorizes the exclusion or ejection of the person from an establishment at
which gaming or pari-mutuel wagering is conducted.
4. Race, color, creed, national origin or
ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression must not be
grounds for placing the name of a person upon the list.
(Added to NRS by 1967,
1041; A 1977,
1430; 1981,
540; 1985,
2136; 2017,
1075)
Notes of Decisions
Spilotro v. State ex rel. Nevada Gaming Comm'n, 661 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1983).
· cites it 12× “: Appellant is challenging the constitutionality of NRS 463.151 through NRS 463.155 and Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 28 on numerous grounds.”
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
· cites it 11× “Nev. Rev.Stat. § 463.151 (1987). On February 19, 1987, the Commission filed and served the final written order of exclusion containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and stayed the implementation of its exclusion order pending plaintiffs right to seek state judicial…”
Spilotro v. State, Ex Rel. Nev. Gaming Com'n, 661 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1983).
· cites it 12× “OPINION MOWBRAY, Justice: Appellant is challenging the constitutionality of NRS 463.151 through NRS 463.155 and Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 28 on numerous grounds.”
Uston v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 448 F. Supp. 116 (D. Nev. 1978).
· cites it 2× “NRS 463.151 requires the exclusion from gaming establishments of certain persons named on a list compiled by the Nevada Gaming Commission for various reasons, one of which is not card counting.”
State v. Rosenthal, 819 P.2d 1296 (Nev. 1991).
· cites it 4× “DISCUSSION Appellants first argue that the decision to include Rosenthal on the List of Excluded Persons was not arbitrary and capricious as the decision was based on criteria set forth in NRS 463.151(3). 1 A finding of any one of the criteria set forth in this statute is…”
State V. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court of the State of Nevada, 899 P.2d 1121 (Nev. 1995).
“1 On August 17, 1994, the Nevada Gaming Commission filed an order placing real party in interest Albert Corbo on the list of persons who are to be excluded from licensed gaming establishments pursuant to NRS 463.151 through 463.155 and Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 28.”
Slade Vs. Caesars Ent., 2016 NV 36 (Nev. 2016).
· cites it 6× “NRS 463.151 regulates the "exclusion or ejection of certain persons from licensed establishments.”
Hairston v. Nevada Gaming Control Bd. (D. Nev. 2025).
· cites it 3× “Hairston 16 asserts that this failure divested the Commission of jurisdiction to hear the complaint and so, the 17 18 1 NRS § 463.151(2) permits the Commission to “provide for the establishment of a list of persons who are to be excluded or ejected from any licensed gaming…”
Slade Vs. Caesars Ent., 2016 NV 36 (Nev. 2016).
· cites it 2× “NRS 463.151 regulates the "exclusion or ejection of certain persons from licensed establishments.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.151(1) — 3 cases
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
“Nev. Rev.Stat. § 463.151 (1987). On February 19, 1987, the Commission filed and served the final written order of exclusion containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and stayed the implementation of its exclusion order pending plaintiffs right to seek state judicial…”
Spilotro v. State, Ex Rel. Nev. Gaming Com'n, 661 P.2d 467 (Nev. 1983).
“OPINION MOWBRAY, Justice: Appellant is challenging the constitutionality of NRS 463.151 through NRS 463.155 and Nevada Gaming Commission Regulation 28 on numerous grounds.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.151(2) — 1 case
Hairston v. Nevada Gaming Control Bd. (D. Nev. 2025).
“Hairston 16 asserts that this failure divested the Commission of jurisdiction to hear the complaint and so, the 17 18 1 NRS § 463.151(2) permits the Commission to “provide for the establishment of a list of persons who are to be excluded or ejected from any licensed gaming…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.151(3) — 1 case
State v. Rosenthal, 819 P.2d 1296 (Nev. 1991).
“DISCUSSION Appellants first argue that the decision to include Rosenthal on the List of Excluded Persons was not arbitrary and capricious as the decision was based on criteria set forth in NRS 463.151(3). 1 A finding of any one of the criteria set forth in this statute is…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.151(3)(1) — 1 case
Thomas v. Bible, 694 F. Supp. 750 (D. Nev. 1988).
“Nev. Rev.Stat. § 463.151 (1987). On February 19, 1987, the Commission filed and served the final written order of exclusion containing findings of fact and conclusions of law and stayed the implementation of its exclusion order pending plaintiffs right to seek state judicial…”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 463.151(3)(a) — 2 cases
Slade Vs. Caesars Ent., 2016 NV 36 (Nev. 2016).
“NRS 463.151 regulates the "exclusion or ejection of certain persons from licensed establishments.”
Slade Vs. Caesars Ent., 2016 NV 36 (Nev. 2016).
“NRS 463.151 regulates the "exclusion or ejection of certain persons from licensed establishments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.