Nevada Revised Statutes

Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210 (2026)

Private action for injury to business or property: Injunctive or other equitable relief; treble damages; attorney’s fees and costs; copy of complaint mailed to Attorney General

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section NRSleg.state.nv.us (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 598A.210  Private action for injury to business or property: Injunctive or other equitable relief; treble damages; attorney’s fees and costs; copy of complaint mailed to Attorney General.  Except as otherwise provided in NRS 598A.430:

      1.  Any person threatened with injury or damage to his or her business or property by reason of a violation of any provision of this chapter may institute a civil action or proceeding for injunctive or other equitable relief, including, without limitation, a temporary restraining order, a preliminary or permanent injunction, restitution or disgorgement. If the court issues a permanent injunction, the plaintiff shall recover reasonable attorney fees, together with costs, as determined by the court.

      2.  Any person injured or damaged directly or indirectly in his or her business or property by reason of a violation of the provisions of this chapter may institute a civil action and shall recover treble damages, together with reasonable attorney fees and costs.

      3.  Any person commencing an action for any violation of the provisions of this chapter shall, simultaneously with the filing of the complaint with the court, mail a copy of the complaint to the Attorney General.

      (Added to NRS by 1975, 950; A 1999, 946; 2021, 311)

     

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2025 · leading case: In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 336 F. Supp. 3d 395 (D.N.J. 2018).
In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 336 F. Supp. 3d 395 (D.N.J. 2018). · cites it 2× “3 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
United Food & Com. Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.), 907 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2018). “, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210(2) (providing for treble damages); Wis.”
In Re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig. Indirect Purchaser Class, 868 F.3d 132 (3rd Cir. 2017). “Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210 (Nevada statute granting standing to indirect purchasers to recover for antitrust violations); In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (Dram) Antitrust Litig.”
Freeman Indus., LLC v. Eastman Chem. Co., 172 S.W.3d 512 (Tenn. 2005). “§ 59-821 (2002); Nev.Rev.Stat. § 598A.210 (1999); N.M. Stat.”
In re Effexor Antitrust Litig., 357 F. Supp. 3d 363 (D.N.J. 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 44-1415 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
Supreme Auto Transp., LLC v. Arcelor Mittal USA, Inc., 902 F.3d 735 (7th Cir. 2018). “Ann § 59-821 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210 ; N.M. Stat.”
In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig., 368 F. Supp. 3d 814 (E.D. Pa. 2019). “3 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
In Re Digit. Music Antitrust Litig., 812 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “The Court relies on the following authority from each state in holding that these states do not follow Illinois Brick: Cal.”
In re Effexor Antitrust Litig., 337 F. Supp. 3d 435 (D.N.J. 2018). · cites it 2× “§ 44-1415 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., 613 F.3d 134 (3rd Cir. 2010). “Code § 75-21-9) Nevada (Nev. Rev. Stat § 598A.210(2)) New Hampshire (N.”
In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust Litig., 749 F. Supp. 2d 224 (M.D. Penn. 2010). “However, the statute itself is silent with respect to the equitable remedies available under state law and defendant identify no authority in support of their contention.”
In re Relafen Antitrust Litig., 225 F.R.D. 14 (D. Mass. 2004). “In addition, however, the laws of these states incorporate certain significant differences, to which the Court now turns.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210(2) — 6 cases
United Food & Com. Workers Unions v. Warner Chilcott Ltd. (In Re Asacol Antitrust Litig.), 907 F.3d 42 (1st Cir. 2018). “, Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210(2) (providing for treble damages); Wis.”
In Re Digit. Music Antitrust Litig., 812 F. Supp. 2d 390 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). “The Court relies on the following authority from each state in holding that these states do not follow Illinois Brick: Cal.”
Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc., 613 F.3d 134 (3rd Cir. 2010). “Code § 75-21-9) Nevada (Nev. Rev. Stat § 598A.210(2)) New Hampshire (N.”
— Nev. Rev. Stat. § 598A.210(3) — 5 cases
In re Lipitor Antitrust Litig., 336 F. Supp. 3d 395 (D.N.J. 2018). “3 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
In re Effexor Antitrust Litig., 357 F. Supp. 3d 363 (D.N.J. 2018). “§ 44-1415 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
In re Generic Pharm. Pricing Antitrust Litig., 368 F. Supp. 3d 814 (E.D. Pa. 2019). “3 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
In re Effexor Antitrust Litig., 337 F. Supp. 3d 435 (D.N.J. 2018). “§ 44-1415 ; Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 598A.210(3) ; Utah Code Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.