Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.011
“Employer” defined
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
NRSleg.state.nv.us (official)
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
NRS 608.011 “Employer” defined. “Employer”
includes every person having control or custody of any employment, place of
employment or any employee.
(Added to NRS by 1985, 578)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2024 · leading case: Boucher v. Shaw
Boucher v. Shaw (2008)
“Under NRS 608.011, an “ ‘[e]mployer’ includes every person having control or custody of any employment, place of employment *1167 or any employee.”
Carolina Casualty Insurance v. McGhan (2008)
“3d at 616 (certifying question of *1227 whether individual managers are “employers” under Nev.Rev.Stat. § 608.011 as a question “of first impression [with] significant implications for Nevada’s wage protection law”); Trustees of Constr.”
Terry v. Sapphire Gentlemen's Club (2014)
“010's definition of employee hinges on NRS 608.011's definition of employer, we must decide the larger issue of when an entity is an employer under NRS 608.”
Boucher v. Shaw (2009)
“…con- trol or custody of any employment, place of employment or any employee.” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.011 . Whether the defendants as individual managers can be held to be “employ- ers” under § 608.011 is a question of first impression. Neither the Nevada Supreme Court nor…”
Yousif v. The Venetian Casino Resort, LLC (2021)
“See NRS 608.011 (defining an “employer” as “every person having control 23 custody .”
Mercer v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (2024)
“Defendants are employers engaged 18 ||in commerce under the provisions of NRS 608.011. 19 10. The identity of DOES 1-50 is unknown at this time and the Complaint will 20 ||be amended at such time when the identities are known to Plaintiffs.”
Boucher v. Shaw (2007)
“…con- trol or custody of any employment, place of employment or any employee.” Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.011 . The question in this case is whether the defendants as individual managers are “employers” under § 608.011. This is a question of first impres- sion.2 Neither the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.